Every automaker needs a volume model to sell at high margins to drive revenue, and they need that income to justify borrowing cash against new models. Had they never invested in the Evoque, they would never have been able to justify the value to Tata when Ford put them on the auction block, and it was rich Uncle Tata's initial investment that allowed JLR to pursue the production and quality control investments that are only now beginning to bear fruit. That's not an overnight process. Had they never done that, Land Rover would be a memory, because selling 500 to a thousand copies of a model each year is not sustainable, even if you're Lamborghini or Ferrari. Porsche saw it earlier than most - and led the way in "luxury performance SUVs" with the Cayenne - now even Ferrari can't resist that market temptation, because they need the cash to afford to build LaFerraris. Margin from the Volkswagen Golf and its badge-engineered cousins pays for Bugatti. Lamborghini is leveraging Audi's Q8 to build the Urus.
I think all of this rage and hate against the Defender wouldn't exist if it was just *shaped* a little more retro than it is, and then in that case it might sell a few hundred more units per year to the people who knew what the old Defender was, and couldn't get one. Because the people who *could* get one in Europe and the UK weren't buying them in any kind of sustainable numbers.