New Hilux (Tacoma?) spotted...

4Rescue

Expedition Leader
There's no doubt that the "economy" of a Diesel engine in the USDM doesn't always (often) currently make sense, but regardless of how much advancement petrol engines make (and they have made a lot, although so have Diesel's), there's still a LOT of applications where Diesels are superior... it's just not "cost", and that's what's going to be the bottom line for Toyota as a large scale auto-maker. For me as an individual, I have an infrastructure of sorts built that makes owning/operating a diesel vehicle less costly and I have a need for the engine's power delivery/capability, but the average buyer will not have that kind of ability or need. So, like the 70-series, Toyota really has no reason to try to "reinvent the wheel", (sad as that is for some of us) when they've got a solid, segment leading formula in the Tacoma. Sure I'd love to have a rubber-floored, manual crank window'd, 6-sp manual trans, manual t-case, diesel powered Tacoma with a more robust frame and larger bed load capacity.... But again, it doesn;t make sense for Toyota to try to satisfy my narrow needs when they KNOW they can make a truck that's, in my eyes, more "soft" and sell it to hundreds of thousands of people a year all the same. It sucks, but it's very predictable business...

Whatever Toyota brings out, I look forward to seeing it, but I'm also really glad I'm building my truck vs making car payments on a new truck that may or may not be exactly what I want.

...
However, I think there may be some hope for a Tundra with a Cummins... it sure would be interesting...

Interesting theory, although Nissan's already confirmed that the new Titan will have a 5.0L Cummins TDV8 so it'd be interesting to see if Toyota would also look to Cummins (As much as I love Toyota's diesels, I think Cummins would be easier and every bit as well made) and how Nissan might feel about that.

That "spy photo" is so made-up that it's tough to tell what it'll look like, but to the poster who put the 2015 Hilux and the spy shot up, well: the rear glass and the door windows all look very similar, and the shape is certainly there... It's merely the cladding that's different and that's all probably fake stuff to throw off the shape anyway. There's a massive industry who's sole job is to "hide" new production cars, and often companies use another, already in production, vehicle over the top of the new chassis/drive-train. At one point Merc was using, I think, a Viper shell with the SLS or maybe the SLR chassis + DT under it and everyone just though it was the most unique sounding Viper ever (although I believe even the exhaust was "disguised" on the early test mules)...

Cheers

Dave
 
Last edited:

Dave Bennett

Adventurist
I think Toyota will wait for another manufacturer to be the diesel 'guinea pig.' If it's successful, Toyota will jump on the bandwagon. If it crashes and burns, then Toyota will be glad they didn't spend the $$ to bring a diesel to the US.

I don't really see the benefits of a diesel in the US market. Back in the old days, a diesel was simpler, more reliable, more fuel efficient, and ran on cheaper, less refined fuel than a corresponding gas engine.

Modern diesels, by contrast, are every bit as computer-laden as their gasoline counterparts, get similar MPGs and run on more expensive fuel.

Modern gasoline engines have gotten so advanced that they've obliterated many of the advantages that diesel used to hold. I'd honestly expect to see a gas/electric hybrid Tacoma before a diesel one.

+1
 
...

Modern diesels, by contrast, are every bit as computer-laden as their gasoline counterparts, get similar MPGs and run on more expensive fuel.


Ummm Are you confusing cost/mile with MPG? Cuase I dont know of any gasoline motors that will do 30+ MPG and move a truck/tow the way a diesel will, save for perhaps a hybrid and I wouldn't consider them worthy just yet, of the "heavy duty" type applications most trucks are used for. Or maybe your just talking in terms of diesel/gasoline car performance?
 
Last edited:

paranoid56

Adventurer
Ummm Are you confusing cost/gallon with MPG? Cuase I dont know of any gasoline motors that will do 30+ MPG and move a truck/tow the way a diesel will, save for perhaps a hybrid and I wouldn't consider them worthy just yet, of the "heavy duty" type applications most trucks are used for. Or maybe your just talking in terms of diesel/gasoline car performance?
exactly.
i would love to buy a double cab hilux diesel. they spec it for around 34k USD and gets 38.7mpg (uk, so i think a bit less in US measurements)
 

paranoid56

Adventurer
You folks make a lot of great points.

The problem is, even if we got a Toyota diesel, it wouldn't be some Australian 1980s mining vehicle version; it would be a nanny state version...

However, I think there may be some hope for a Tundra with a Cummins... it sure would be interesting...

oh, and we did get a toyota diesel in the 80s. its was ummm, just ok lol.
and cummins wont be going into it, but i think those are going in to the new Nissans
 

plainjaneFJC

Deplorable
Not sure why people are still so enchanted with diesel. I tow 17 to 20k and almost bought a gasser but I was maxed out or slightly over tow ratings. In a few years I think diesel will be even a tougher sale with all the turbo direct injection gassers coming out.
 

paranoid56

Adventurer
Not sure why people are still so enchanted with diesel. I tow 17 to 20k and almost bought a gasser but I was maxed out or slightly over tow ratings. In a few years I think diesel will be even a tougher sale with all the turbo direct injection gassers coming out.

because they get you better mpg, better tq, generally a more reliable engine. also and engine that shouldn't add 5-8k to the damn price either lol. I really like being able to get 50mpp in my wifes tdi car.
 

nickw

Adventurer
exactly.
i would love to buy a double cab hilux diesel. they spec it for around 34k USD and gets 38.7mpg (uk, so i think a bit less in US measurements)

38.7 mpg imperial = 32+ mpg US, no way. Most guys running the D4D's get in the 9-11 km/l range which is 21-26 mpg. The same group of guys with the 4L is in the 6.5-7.5 km/l which is 15.5-17.5 mpg, which jives with what guys are getting here in the states.

My guess is IF we get a diesel it will be high $30's. Most car manufacturers tend to up-sell the diesels with premium packages like offroad, nav, wheels, etc. Assuming Toyota will do the same, you'll be in the high $30's if not low $40's. If they offer a 'stripped' down version, based on what the diesel sells for over the petrol model in AU/SA, you'll be in that mid $30 range.

I think this pricing issue is another BIG reason Toyota wont offer a diesel. Once a rig goes past $40k you really get into a whole different market. Not sure they can keep the diesel under that figure while still offering a 'sporty' refined handling package, the proper amount of accessorizing, electronics package etc. to compete with the market....
 

nickw

Adventurer
because they get you better mpg, better tq, generally a more reliable engine. also and engine that shouldn't add 5-8k to the damn price either lol. I really like being able to get 50mpp in my wifes tdi car.

I still disagree with the reliability claim. Not sure what your getting 50 mpg with? I have a TDI Sportwagen that can get close to that but reliability is a big ?. All the new emissions stuff is really spendy and complicated. They don't do well on poor fuel....and if you get a bad batch it can wreak havoc with a $8k repair bill. Turbos are spendy and can last 300k or blow apart at 50k.
 

Martinjmpr

Wiffleball Batter
because they get you better mpg, better tq, generally a more reliable engine. also and engine that shouldn't add 5-8k to the damn price either lol. I really like being able to get 50mpp in my wifes tdi car.

More reliable than what? The 3.4, the 4.0 and the 4.7 gassers all have legendary reliability and can all go 200K+ without any problems, so what does a diesel offer that they don't?
 

plainjaneFJC

Deplorable
Actually to me most of those statements have been false. MPG is better, but its marginal. Diesel engines-modern ones, are less reliable, and more expensive to own and operate. I own a small fleet of work trucks so I have quite a bit of experience in the gas vs. diesel debate. The only place diesel is better for me is a higher tow capacity.
because they get you better mpg, better tq, generally a more reliable engine. also and engine that shouldn't add 5-8k to the damn price either lol. I really like being able to get 50mpp in my wifes tdi car.
 

sn_85

Observer
Toyota definitely needs to come out with a diesel engine and it's not to satisfy the masses. It's to be competitive with the Colorado/Canyon which will get the I4 Duramax diesel in 2016 and the next generation Frontier which will most likely have a diesel as well. Could you imagine everyone else putting out multiple drive trains along with a diesel option and Toyota being the only one without one? Toyota is already known as being conservative and that would only add more fuel to the fire. Now, we might know the difference between the quality of a GM vs Toyota (and I would never touch GM with a 10 foot stick) truck however it would be foolish to believe that a buyer without brand loyalty would not want to explore a diesel option. Options are NEVER a bad thing so I see it to be a little silly arguing back and forth about whether or not they need to release one in the US. The more options the better. If you don't see an advantage to a diesel engine or if the price premium put it out of the budget then don't buy it. Simple as that. At the very least Toyota needs to offer vastly improved drive trains in their gas engines and I do mean vastly improved as full sized V8's already outperform it in MPG and towing.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
187,898
Messages
2,899,707
Members
229,072
Latest member
fireofficer001
Top