That is what Toyota does, above all else. I mean, when have they not?
On the tank I am not hopeful. I've never understood why every modern full size truck does not have a factory option for twin tanks or at least 50 gallons. Do OEM's not yet know what we use trucks for? There is room under every one of em.
As stated, that may have been true 14 years ago. But it only took GM and Ford a couple years to match/beat them in a lot of areas. Its a solid truck still but lacks seriously in a lot of areas now and has for a while. The GM 5.3L kicks the Tundra's butt towing even though it has a 25hp/tq deficit because it has a modern transmission that can put it in its power band. I have the same problem with my 4.6L GX. It may make 300 hp but to get there you have to be at a very specific speed otherwise the transmission dumps you at 4000 rpm and it can't give you everything it has.
So they better come up with something really good if they plan on going on a 14 year vacation again.
And the current gen Taco. Lol. I test drove all the mid-sized trucks a couple years ago and the old Frontier made the Taco look bad. That engine and trans are a joke.
Seriously? Does frame rot ring a bell? Or that horrendous 3VZ 3.0 V6. I mean, I absolutely loved my first Gen Tacoma’s and 4Runners, but to say they had no dark times is very much incorrect.
i am part of the 2nd Gen 4Runner group on FB and they HATE the 3VZ. HATE it. Every day someone is posting up with a blown head gasket.
You don't think they'll keep 38 gal? Don't think they'd go backwards... unless the mpgs improve a lot.
I think I have enough room for 150 gal under my truck... ginormous amounts of empty space under there....
GM did. They only have a 24 gallon tank now I think. Luckily the new 3.0 Duramax seems to do extremely well and is priced extremely well(like $1200 over the 5.3L V8 and cheaper than the 6.2L), but I literally would not buy a current gas GM 1500 because the 24 gallon tank.
Its all about the GVWR and loaded weight I think. 12 gallons of gas is like 75 lbs and that is coming off an already low payload capacity.
Love the 38 gallon fuel tank on my ‘17 tundra. Fuel tank size was one of the reasons I passed on getting a tundra back in 2012 and went with a f150 ecoboost with it‘s 36 gallon fuel tank. All the options, payload, down low torque, and towing numbers also swayed me. Loved that truck,....at first. On our first long trip out of town with it, it broke down, the first of many break downs unfortunately. Sometimes, simplicity is just better.
What happened to your Ecoboost that it straight up broke down? They have their problems but not to the point of leaving people on the side of the road typically.