Currently, I have no plans to do any regular towing. I don't own a boat, enclosed trailer or camper. Because of that, I'm not focused on the engine with most power or potential. I do want the most reliable motor, so let me know your thoughts if the 3.5 has proven to be more durable with higher mileage than a 5.0.
Is a bed rack capable of supporting more weight on top than a fiberglass shell ?
It always seems like most Overland builds are based on the crew cab/double cab configuration. Is there a reason that cab space takes preference over bed space?
Does anyone think a supercab 6.5ft bed is a better configuration over the supercrew with 5.5ft bed?
Thanks again for the advice.
A proper bed rack will support more weight than 90% of fiberglass toppers and most aluminum commercial grade toppers.
Most builds are crew cabs because most full size trucks sold are crew cabs. They are the modern sedan.
I prefer the increase in bed space with my SCAB, but if I regularly had to seat four adults if be singing a different tune.
I think in 2014 the 3.7 was available in the crew cab, but not sure if also available with 4x4.
I'd list reliability for engines in descending order as 3.7, 5.0, 3.5.
Take that with a grain of salt as there a thousands of 3.5 EcoBoost out there with zero problems with mega miles, but when they do have problems, they aren't cheap.
Try to get one with the factory tow package if possible.
If you can still find RCI skid plates, I recommend them. And you for sure want a fuel tank skid. The tank is like five feet long and plastic.
Try to find the steepest gearing you can, ideally 3.73 so you can run 33s no issue.
Even with a naturally aspirated motor I recommend a tuner to clean up the lazy throttle and shifting as programmed from the factory, and it allows you to account for different size tires.
And the 36 gallon tank is a must!