You really don't get it, do you? View attachment 114430
I am not taking sides here, but want to point some things out from a business point. We have been in the same position before where a customer chose to send something back before we authorized it. The reason a business wants to authorize the return is to make sure that A) they have the correct information to remedy the situation (in this case more measurements, weights etc), B) installer error is ruled out, C) explore a better way to resolve the issue vs shipping heavy springs back and forth.
Alcan was not given this opportunity at all. How are they supposed to fix the springs now. Also the OP stated he wanted 2" of lift. What prior measurement was this based on? Stock on a very old, highly custom vehicle? It is unlikely Alcan had info on this truck in their database to have "stock spring specs" so everything would have had to be done on the weight of the vehicle.
Is the real issue here that the truck leaned, or that the OP did not get the lift he expected? In both cases, for Alcan to correct the springs, they would have needed more info and I can see the owners frustration as to how he is expected to correct the issue with no further info.
If fixing the springs was not an option, then a consumer should always check with the supplier before sending something back for a full credit. Suggesting a CC dispute is wrong. It will not work. Having gone down this road as well. If the consumer does not follow the vendors return policies, the CC company will not agree to the charge back. It will take months to resolve but in the end if you want to g othat route, be sure your side of the aisle is clean and you have all your i dotted and t crossed.
Did Alcan make the wrong springs, who knows. We are not privy to what was exchanged in the beginning. What 10 years in the business has thought me is there is always 2 sides to the complaint. If they knowingly or unknowingly made a mistake in the spring specs, they should have been given the chance to correct it. They were not given this chance.
There is lessons to be learned for everyone in this. Unfortunately at other peoples expense. When you order something custom, document everything in writing. Don't assume anything. Make sure you ask all the questions, even the question "Do you need anything more from me!". And more than anything, when ordering, make sure you are comfortable with a companies return/refund policy.
I am not taking sides here, but want to point some things out from a business point. We have been in the same position before where a customer chose to send something back before we authorized it. The reason a business wants to authorize the return is to make sure that A) they have the correct information to remedy the situation (in this case more measurements, weights etc), B) installer error is ruled out, C) explore a better way to resolve the issue vs shipping heavy springs back and forth.
Alcan was not given this opportunity at all. How are they supposed to fix the springs now. Also the OP stated he wanted 2" of lift. What prior measurement was this based on? Stock on a very old, highly custom vehicle? It is unlikely Alcan had info on this truck in their database to have "stock spring specs" so everything would have had to be done on the weight of the vehicle.
Is the real issue here that the truck leaned, or that the OP did not get the lift he expected? In both cases, for Alcan to correct the springs, they would have needed more info and I can see the owners frustration as to how he is expected to correct the issue with no further info.
If fixing the springs was not an option, then a consumer should always check with the supplier before sending something back for a full credit. Suggesting a CC dispute is wrong. It will not work. Having gone down this road as well. If the consumer does not follow the vendors return policies, the CC company will not agree to the charge back. It will take months to resolve but in the end if you want to g othat route, be sure your side of the aisle is clean and you have all your i dotted and t crossed.
Did Alcan make the wrong springs, who knows. We are not privy to what was exchanged in the beginning. What 10 years in the business has thought me is there is always 2 sides to the complaint. If they knowingly or unknowingly made a mistake in the spring specs, they should have been given the chance to correct it. They were not given this chance.
There is lessons to be learned for everyone in this. Unfortunately at other peoples expense. When you order something custom, document everything in writing. Don't assume anything. Make sure you ask all the questions, even the question "Do you need anything more from me!". And more than anything, when ordering, make sure you are comfortable with a companies return/refund policy.
Those are good reasons for getting an RMA, and the OP has admitted his error on this point. However, the fact still remains that the springs don't work and Alcan has both them and the money. This is an unacceptable conclusion in my view. Alcan should do what they can to remedy the problem, especially as the OP paid to return the springs and has offered to pay to have the repaired ones shipped back. The OP is meeting Alcan halfway and Alcan should at least try to do the same, instead of slamming the door in his face.
Besides, Christo, don't you agree as a vendor that regardless of the details, Alcan is potentially losing thousands in business over this as we speak. Isn't this far more of a cost than just fixing the damned springs for this guy?
Those are good reasons for getting an RMA, and the OP has admitted his error on this point. However, the fact still remains that the springs don't work and Alcan has both them and the money. This is an unacceptable conclusion in my view. Alcan should do what they can to remedy the problem, especially as the OP paid to return the springs and has offered to pay to have the repaired ones shipped back. The OP is meeting Alcan halfway and Alcan should at least try to do the same, instead of slamming the door in his face.
Besides, Christo, don't you agree as a vendor that regardless of the details, Alcan is potentially losing thousands in business over this as we speak. Isn't this far more of a cost than just fixing the damned springs for this guy?
If the OP just called up and said give me some Toyota springs with a 2" lift and that is what was shipped, then the OP is at fault for not specifying his intended needs/use.
Wondering if that is indeed the case, and just saying they are custom because they are aftermarket. I could say the same thing about
my suspension, it is custom since it isn't stock...however it is not specifically made for my personal truck. Just off the shelf components.
Because if Alcan is refusing to fix the problem there is a good reason. They have been in business for an awfully long time, with a lot of
happy customers. One guy not happy wouldn't make me not purchase from them.
Alaskacreeker:
Did you fill out their order form, or just call the shop?
http://alcanspring.com/order.htm
Has Alcan told their side of the story on any of the forums?