calicamper
Expedition Leader
Those 80’s Rangers were small, 2.9 was what 150hp? The only bad thing was the pump seal in the AT failure. The dealers got pretty good at replacing it. The manual was definitely better choice. Pretty sure the engine was Mitsubishi sourced.I was just comparing EPA numbers on the 2.3. I had a 2.9 Ranger as well and preferred the 2.3, an ‘85 maybe? My current Ranger (I’ve had 3) does get better than EPA, without the camper of course.