..
:sombrero: :sombrero:
Hi
adam88,
Probably the opposite of the Unibomber, because I'm a pacifist, and I've always loved and still love technology....:coffeedrink:
Putting the same point more philosophically, I am a humanist, I see humans as an important and valuable evolutionary development, and I very much reject the philosophical movements known as "
Neo-Luddism", "
Anarcho-Primitivism", and "
Deep Ecology", the movements that largely inspired the Unibomber -- see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-Luddism ,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_ecology ,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-primitivism ,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rewilding_(anarchism) ,
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/anonymous-what-is-anarcho-primitivism ,
http://io9.gizmodo.com/why-do-the-anarcho-primitivists-want-to-abolish-civiliz-1633477541 ,
http://fee.org/articles/is-the-unabomber-an-ecobomber/ , and
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Kaczynski . As written earlier in the thread, my own view is that the ultimate, non-proximate causes of the ecological crisis run very deep, and are inextricably woven into who and what we are as creatures. We are the first emergence of fully self-conscious, rational, tool-using, language-using, and culturally plastic Mind on earth. Any emergence of advanced Mind will inevitably mess up the ecosystem, at least at first, on any planet that has enough evolutionary history and enough complexity of Life to generate such Mind. So for me the solution is more Mind, not less; the solution is making an effort to use our Science and Technology to achieve an ecologically "steady state" form of civilization dedicated to humane ends, and a civilization that simultaneously allows local and planetary ecosystems to recover. Whereas the Unibomber's deepest wish was to bomb humanity back to the stone age.
For a longer discussion, see post #2441, sections 1 and 2, at
http://www.expeditionportal.com/for...w-6x6-Hybrid-Drivetrain?p=2016565#post2016565 .
********************************************
1. Gone with the Wynns
********************************************
As for
"obsessed with campers..... ", take a look at the videos below made by the Wynns. They have great documentary value, because they nicely capture the problematic that this thread is dealing with. For the Wynns' website, see
http://www.gonewiththewynns.com ,
http://www.gonewiththewynns.com/about ,
http://www.gonewiththewynns.com/map ,
http://www.gonewiththewynns.com/rvin , and
https://www.youtube.com/watch?featu...5YKEqC5FqvTTqiC6XaTGiIr2G8T_bVE&v=sxHN1TiWPq0 .
I first got interested in expedition motorhome design mainly because globally capable boats created for elderly, adventurous, wealthy couples have already been done. In catamarans there's
Gunboats, and in diesel-powered yachts there's
FPB. See
http://www.gunboat.com and
http://www.setsail.com . Gunboats typically sell for 4 or 5 million USD (they are all-carbon-fiber construction, laid by hand), and FPB yachts begin at about 3 - 4 million USD for the 64-footer – see
http://www.berthon.co.uk/fpb-motor-yacht/fpb-64/ and
http://www.boatinternational.com/yachts-for-sale/fpb784--80919 . In terms of my personal background I am more of a sailor than an overlander. But as a transportation designer I will naturally be interested in what seem to be instances of "market failure", or "empty market niches." The more that I've investigated motorhomes, the more I've become convinced that the conventional motorhome industry in North America is out to lunch. And I've come to the conclusion that if quite a few active, elderly couples are willing to spend 4 or 5 million on a Gunboat or an FPB, many more would be willing to spend 1.5 to 2 million USD on a large Class A that could truly travel the whole planet.
Watching the following recent videos created by the Wynns was sweet vindication: they confirm pretty much everything I have been saying in this thread.
For instance, that the American motorhome industry is extremely conservative, and very slow to change. That the existing customer base of elderly retired Americans have terrible taste, and a preference for interior design that's at least 40 or 50 years out of date. That because of this unfortunate demographic legacy, existing motorhome manufacturers feel constrained to design for their "base", not venturing too far forward for fear of alienating existing customers and undermining brand loyalty – see
http://www.gonewiththewynns.com/resurrecting-dinosaurs-wynn-custom-rv ,
http://www.gonewiththewynns.com/category/rvin/resurrecting-dinosaurs , and
http://www.gonewiththewynns.com/rv-modifications-technology :
The Wynns, by way of contrast, are a young American couple who have excellent taste. Jason Wynn is a photographer and Nikki Wynn is a make-up artist; they've both travelled extensively in Europe; so let's just say that their aesthetic standards are probably much more demanding than most elderly Americans.....:ylsmoke:
The design that the Wynns finally arrived at in the videos above is by far one of the most beautiful American motorhome interiors I've yet seen. It still has a few defects, like the horrible "grandma's kitchen" beveling on the cupboard fronts. But as the Wynns very clearly state in these videos, the cupboard fronts with American-colonial beveling were not their choice. If it had been their choice, they would have preferred clean, European-style cupboards. The Wynns wanted the exact opposite of "grandma's kitchen", and for the most part they succeeded admirably in getting it, pushing Fleetwood Motorhomes to the very limit of its design capability.
********************************************
CONTINUED IN NEXT POST
.