T-Willy
Well-known member
Toyota needs to tread very very carefully IMO, enthusiasts drive the legacy, LC are what they are in the US because of enthusiasts, they don't want to step on those toes and need to respect that relationship. It keeps prices up, drives forums sections like on Expo and IH8MUD, drives aftermarket, social media enthusiasm, etc....you lose or water that down, those thing start getting diluted and IMO (as an underqualified market analyst) you lose what the name stood for. If I was in that Toyota board room I would of fought tooth and nail to keep the drivetrain in line with other HD options....even if it wasn't needed, even if it didn't really make a huge difference in performance, the perception is the key IMO. I saw this on IH8MUD the other day, LX vs GX tie rod ends.....this is the stuff that gets most enthusiasts excited:
View attachment 790004
But has Toyota published specs on the 250's axels, tie rod ends, arms, etc.?
Having owned 80s since they were available, I'm quite sensitive to matters of robustness. But robustness and a mid-50s price point aren't mutually exclusive.
Our family's first (and quite austere) 80 rolled off the lot at a mid-$50ks price point (in inflation adjusted dollars). By the mid-1990s, Land Cruiser prices skyrocketed with the addition of luxury bits (but not better hardware). Three decades of more luxury and cost ultimately killed the 200.
I'm not surprised that Land Cruiser's return now to its austere roots (good), freed from luxury bloat (good), also means a return to mid-$50k pricing (good).
A retreat from luxury? Yes. But I'll be surprised if the 250 retreats from the robustness we've come to expect from U.S. badged Land Cruisers.