What if the 4 runner is smaller more nimble and more rock crawler rather than overland focused, for less...that would make sense....getting rid of the Sequoia in a few years would also make sense. With this LC priced where it is, and the Sequoia priced where it is combined with the pitiful sales numbers...its time to put that model to bed. As I understand it, the only reason they kept it around is because the dealers begged them to.Just watched the tfl review.
Couple of things jump out at me. Toyota has a serious model line up issue now. They have 3 versions of the 4runner in slightly different configurations and all very close in size.
The strange rear false raised floor bump up from the rear hatch seen in the Sequoia and now LC is a serious head scratcher. GM did that to the prior gen Tahoe/yukon when they were trying to eek out a few more yrs on the dated platform yet have fold in floor 3rd row to compete with the Expedition.
Toyotas SUV line up is super baffling with these new renditions of the 4runner, Sequoia and LC which are all very similar in size.
If they are the same then you could say a 4Runner is as well….I love the passive aggressive shade I keep seeing people post here: "It's a prado, just set your expectations accordingly..."
That's the same as the nonsense on IH8Mud. Some people need some pretty significant therapy.
Nope. They always were Land Cruisers. All of them And they all work just the same, arguably the best in the industry. Please offer constructive comments.
I don't think it's passive aggressive - there is some 'fact' in what they are saying...while a Prado my be a Landcruiser in spirit is more of a marketing term as they are not built with the same duty cycle in mind. With your logic we could call the GX's, 4runner, FJCruiser and I guess the Tacoma a "Landcruiser" since they use many of the same parts depending how you want to define things. Made in Japan vs Mexico, oversize axles/running gear (9.5") vs lighter duty stuff (8.x"), duty cycle design parameters (the infamous 500,000 mile figure), etc.....only the HD "Landcruiser" ticks all the boxes, the others don't tick them all but maybe some....doesn't make it better or worse, just different.I love the passive aggressive shade I keep seeing people post here: "It's a prado, just set your expectations accordingly..."
That's the same as the nonsense on IH8Mud. Some people need some pretty significant therapy.
Nope. They always were Land Cruisers. All of them And they all work just the same, arguably the best in the industry. Please offer constructive comments.
What if the 4 runner is smaller more nimble and more rock crawler rather than overland focused, for less...that would make sense....
The Sequoia redesign was definitely needed but instead of doing something that gave Tahoe/Yukon and Expedition shoppers a possible alternative they sorta made a weird 4runner/LC bastardized rendition with a really messed up rear floor design thats trash for any utility function.What if the 4 runner is smaller more nimble and more rock crawler rather than overland focused, for less...that would make sense....getting rid of the Sequoia in a few years would also make sense. With this LC priced where it is, and the Sequoia priced where it is combined with the pitiful sales numbers...its time to put that model to bed. As I understand it, the only reason they kept it around is because the dealers begged them to.
I think (hope) the new LC sales numbers double or triple the Sequoia and put it to bed once and for all.
It’s possible but honestly that space sits with the Rav and the new mini truck variant.What if the 4 runner is smaller more nimble and more rock crawler rather than overland focused, for less...that would make sense....getting rid of the Sequoia in a few years would also make sense. With this LC priced where it is, and the Sequoia priced where it is combined with the pitiful sales numbers...its time to put that model to bed. As I understand it, the only reason they kept it around is because the dealers begged them to.
I think (hope) the new LC sales numbers double or triple the Sequoia and put it to bed once and for all.
It's a 135% improvement over my Excursion LOL.At 27mpg, that's a 50% increase for our 5th Gen 4Runner resulting in a 33% fuel savings. That's huge. The increased electric gremlins that could pop up is always concerning but I have more faith in Toyota than other manufacturers.
They are more than likely just gonna put a top on a Tacoma and price it similar for the new 4 runner. Same powertrain, same general look, same general function etc. Just like the good old days.It’s possible but honestly that space sits with the Rav and the new mini truck variant.
The 4runner has far better cache in that mid sized proper 4x4 suv zone than the LC does due to the decades of pitching the LC as a lux pig.
The starter battery is in your left red cubbyThe hybrid battery should have been split in 2 and placed along the cubby holes near the wheel humps vs raising the floor 6-8 inches. So much wasted space. I think it would be more important to have the extra height.
It's a 135% improvement over my Excursion LOL.
This part right here...THIS is the value I'm waiting for. I don't care that the towing was reduced from the 200 by a ton. I'm not towing a 4-ton trailer to any trailhead in the first place. But it'll be really interesting to see where payload falls, particularly as it's already loaded down with the battery pack.Here's hoping for a payload of at least 1,500 lbs.