Get your tickets to THE BIG THING 2026!
Jeremy,
stop horsing around - get yourself an '02+ G500. You'll never look back.
If you buy a 2002-2004, you end up fixing things that MB **************** from being cheap cocksuckers looking to bilk the US market.... $$$$
I too am hunting for a G. Could you elaborate on those things that MB cheaped out on?
harald is right. it comes down to broken parts and spending money.
if you buy a pre 2002, you spend money fixing normal wear and tear items just because the damn thing is old... aka zimms 1996..... $$$$
if you buy a 2002-2004, you end up fixing things that MB **************** from being cheap cocksuckers looking to bilk the US market.... $$$$
but with the latter of the two options you get a newer truck thats worth more money and has lots more balls per gallon. better ROI.
unless your looking at crossing the congo the up front premium for a diesel doesnt add up for newbie buyers in the US like us. we have cheap gas, its readily available even in central america, we have vast distances of improved highways to get from rough spot to rough spot, and a 500 will kick an anemic diesels *** on those roads.
that having been said.... if i could find a low mileage LHD toyota 70 series diesel troopy in the US, i'd burn the G for the insurance money!(so i do sorta get your desire)
ZIMM (meh), dudeski, ROI?!?!?
Really?
Really really, or just sorta kinda ROI?
absolutely really really. any up front money spent on a diesel over and above what the MPG saves over a gasser, is money not spent on a trip, or not spent on something else much more useful on the rig. if you can have a fully decked out expedition rig for the cost of swapping a late model gasser to a diesel, when all the diesel will do is spare you two jerry cans all the while under-performing compared to the gas motor... whats the point, unless the point is to brag about your diesel?
and yes, i did a simple cost analysis where i put the cost of the conversion into my WORST performing conservative fund and used 5000 miles a year for 10 years as a pro rate (quite high for a non dd) when factoring fuel savings.
do it. its amazing what you'll lose!the only variable you cant pin down is what fuel will cost in the future so i took $3.50/gal at an increase of 3% a year, which with china up and coming is probably low... but i offset that in my mind with the fact i never keep a rig that long anyway.
ya gotta think this **** out, dude!
absolutely really really. any up front money spent on a diesel over and above what the MPG saves over a gasser, is money not spent on a trip, or not spent on something else much more useful on the rig. if you can have a fully decked out expedition rig for the cost of swapping a late model gasser to a diesel, when all the diesel will do is spare you two jerry cans all the while under-performing compared to the gas motor... whats the point, unless the point is to brag about your diesel?
and yes, i did a simple cost analysis where i put the cost of the conversion into my WORST performing conservative fund and used 5000 miles a year for 10 years as a pro rate (quite high for a non dd) when factoring fuel savings.
do it. its amazing what you'll lose!the only variable you cant pin down is what fuel will cost in the future so i took $3.50/gal at an increase of 3% a year, which with china up and coming is probably low... but i offset that in my mind with the fact i never keep a rig that long anyway.
ya gotta think this **** out, dude!
Hey Jeremy,
Why not just keep the 300GD factory stock, take an extra day off work for the drive to Utah or Death Valley. That thing would do fine off road. Your main dissatisfaction is probably due to highway driving performance. Buy a VW Golf TDI for the highway and build an adventure rig out of the Gwagen. Tom Sheppard isn't driving his G290 to the market and up the grade north of town for errands.
If you want a do-all rig out of the box, any 460/463 gasser will do, or a 300GDT like Alan's would do the trick if you could find one. Leave the stock tire size though. The pre 2002 463's are more desireable in large part due to the rarity which is associaited with them. The build quality issues are not really as dramatic as they are made out to be. The locker switch position is improved in the latest models (2002+), the dash allows for a 2 Din unit for nav systems, the minor things like glove box latch and interior door handles are replaced with identical units that are used on the current 2011 models. Same for the window regulator, although that problem has yet to be fixed definitively.
I sold my 300GD and saved up some coin over a few months for the G500. If my other car wasn't a meandering Westfalia, I would probably have been satisfied with keeping my 300GD and DDing a faster car. Just saying that there are options that include adjusting your expectations. Have you read Gary Stroh's account of his pan American trip in his naturally aspirated 300GD? If not, you should. There is nothing "wrong" with your Gwagen as it was built from the factory.
I feel a little better.Just wanted to make sure you weren't referring to resale.
Fuel economy, future expenses, upgrades, maintenance.....the economics (cost) of owning a vehicle and what you get out of it, I get that part.
Jeremy's signature quote sums it up.
Jeremy dude, I think the answer is for you to have both. Mostly because you're a baller though. :ylsmoke: