What did I do to my Expo Jeep today? I sold it. Got tired of the endless electrical, rear end issues, some fixed under warranty, others not.
Loved my 2002 Wrangler. The 2012 JK? Not so much. I am not a brand basher, but I will be hard pressed to buy another Jeep now. Back to a Toyota for me.
If you spent what a JK costs on a TJ or YJ you would have a Jeep much better than a JK, just my opinion though. I'm not a fan of the V6, kind of a Jeep inline 6 purest myself.
OK, go XJ then. New JK=$45 to $50K, with that kind of money into a XJ, ZJ, or WJ and I bet you come up with one HELL of a Jeep LOL. My thing with the V6 is the lack of torque, It was designed to power cars for the most part. The inline 6 (4.0l, 4.0l HO) were designed using off the shelf AMC parts from older I6 designs as well as improved lock strength just for Jeep. They hand picked the stronger parts from other AMC I6s to provide the Jeep just what it needed, but that was back then. Now, what the manufacturer wants is a motor they can put into as many different models as possible. This works great on paper but the needs of a mini van, a full sized truck, and a Jeep are all different so their has to be compromises made. What the Germans did was to compromise on the torque range, allowing it to be higher up in the RPM. It was a 2 out of 3 call, both the van and the truck could live well with that through gearing, the Jeep...not so much. The Jeep needs the torque from idle to 3k RPM and the V6 just comes up short. I'm not saying the V6 is a bad motor at all, it is a real power house of a mini van and does OK in the trucks for it's size.Maybe, but I would not have 4 doors, and lots of cargo space for the family....plus a rougher ride in all conditions. tit for tat. My v6 does just fine.
If you spent what a JK costs on a TJ or YJ you would have a Jeep much better than a JK, just my opinion though. I'm not a fan of the V6, kind of a Jeep inline 6 purest myself.
With the issues I've had (and the ton of cash I've spent on my JK), I've thought about 'what if'. What if I'd gone with a nice LJ or a much older Scrambler (and then re-worked it)? Price wise, I'd probably be around the same but have an amazing machine... both cases would see me with a lot of cargo room. However I'd also not have those rear doors. Considering how often I used them (frequently), it would be an issue for me. So I'll just suck it up and keep working out the kinks. Not ideal... but seeing how I still have a smile every time I drive it, I guess that's enough for now. I'm also at the point where I'll never get my money's worth out of selling this. My total spent on this has to be around 70k+. Absurd I know.
OK, go XJ then. New JK=$45 to $50K, with that kind of money into a XJ, ZJ, or WJ and I bet you come up with one HELL of a Jeep LOL. My thing with the V6 is the lack of torque, It was designed to power cars for the most part. The inline 6 (4.0l, 4.0l HO) were designed using off the shelf AMC parts from older I6 designs as well as improved lock strength just for Jeep. They hand picked the stronger parts from other AMC I6s to provide the Jeep just what it needed, but that was back then. Now, what the manufacturer wants is a motor they can put into as many different models as possible. This works great on paper but the needs of a mini van, a full sized truck, and a Jeep are all different so their has to be compromises made. What the Germans did was to compromise on the torque range, allowing it to be higher up in the RPM. It was a 2 out of 3 call, both the van and the truck could live well with that through gearing, the Jeep...not so much. The Jeep needs the torque from idle to 3k RPM and the V6 just comes up short. I'm not saying the V6 is a bad motor at all, it is a real power house of a mini van and does OK in the trucks for it's size.