transporterjr
IsLost
While I have never owned a Westy, I know many who have. They are 'unique' in terms of reliability, but parts are everywhere (yes, not so much for the Synchro components) and they are quite capable for light off-road duty. They have all the comforts of home built right in and plenty of space for storage. Would it be my first choice? No, not by a long shot. But look at the number of people who have driven these around the world and I think you can say that they have proven themselves as capable overlanders.
The Westfalias I have seen in "round the world" exploits have been the "Bay window" air cooled busses - 69-78. Not saying a Syncro has not made the trip, but I cannot recall one. Having said that I envy the Syncro from time to time.
I have a 2WD Vanagon Weekender Westfalia - unfortunately, these do not have anywhere near the off road traction of the earlier models -I'm sure the reason for the development of the Syncro model some 7 years into the model cycle. I, and many others, have had the 2WD ones stuck on flat & level wet grass. Anyone who asks me about getting a Vanagon, I reply "Only if it is going to be your hobby". In other words, a lot of time and effort that other people cannot understand.
For one or two people, I say get a pick-up with a topper. Sure, a van is the greatest format for a small camper, but the topper equipped pick-up is not far behind. I hope to get one of those soon. I'll still keep the VW, but if I am going to venture into the "outback" of Canada, I can see me taking the Toyota pick-up instead.
YET - why do I still think of an 80 series, 100 series, or my favorite, a G-Wagen, when I think overland vehicle? Easier to see out of and maneuver - perhaps? Is it just looks? A G-Wagen with an Autohome roof top camper, looks like it just plain rocks!