s.e.charles
Well-known member
1.2 ton is impressive. interesting framing components; i wonder if others will run with this material.
2,400 pounds, eh?
2,400 pounds, eh?
i've seen the aerodynamic shrouds on the back of a lot of trucks and know its supposed to save fuel, but i didnt think about stability. I could claim to be be part way there with the slope at the back of the roof, but in reality that is to protect the awning from sun damage while rolled up.....i've not seen the airtabs but they look like they would be easy to fitInteresting build , you've done so much work with excellent progress . (I'm fascinated with how many joints you have in the plumbing system )
I have noticed with my camper , a significant improvement in on road stability after I added "AIRTABS" , you may find it interesting to research them .
Airtab | Aerodynamic Fuel Savers | Welcome
Airtabs™ are powerful vortex generators that reduce vehicle drag, save fuel, and improve vehicle safety by improving stability and mirror visibility in rain or snow.www.airtab.com
The European Ranger with the supercab has a rated payload of 1.2 tonnes...
actually 2640lbs. And i've just paid to have it up-plated to 1500kg/3300lbs with the airbag suspension. I believe from articles i have read it is mostly down to suspension differences between North America and the rest of the world - you guys are alleged to prefer a softer ride and more luxurious interiors as you use pickups as everyday vehicles, whereas traditionally Europe and Australia use them as primarily work vehicles, although that is becoming much more blurred nowadays. Personally I think there is also an element of manufacturers wanting to push you guys towards the larger, more expensive F-series/RAM/Tundra/Titan models....we don't get that size of pickup over here so they are not poaching from that market by making the smaller models more capable1.2 tonnes = 2,400lbs. How is the payload so high? My US spec Tacoma is only rated at 1,100lbs. I would love a 2,4000lb. payload, it would open up options for so many campers.
actually 2640lbs. And i've just paid to have it up-plated to 1500kg/3300lbs with the airbag suspension. I believe from articles i have read it is mostly down to suspension differences between North America and the rest of the world - you guys are alleged to prefer a softer ride and more luxurious interiors as you use pickups as everyday vehicles, whereas traditionally Europe and Australia use them as primarily work vehicles, although that is becoming much more blurred nowadays. Personally I think there is also an element of manufacturers wanting to push you guys towards the larger, more expensive F-series/RAM/Tundra/Titan models....we don't get that size of pickup over here so they are not poaching from that market by making the smaller models more capable
no problem - i only post here to share my experiences (good or bad) that others may learn from....The big three definitely want to push people into the bigger trucks, but Ford and Chevy both have mid-size trucks now available, but neither with the payload of your truck. However, I did just look and the Ranger is rated between 1600-2100lbs. approx. I kinda wish I'd waited and bought one over my Tacoma (rated between 1100-1600lbs. payload). Thats insane that the Ranger payload starts where the Tacoma stops.
I don't want to hijack your thread here, but I would like to know how adding airbags increases your payload by 660lbs.? I thought they helped with added weight, but didn't actually increase payload. Also, is your higher payload just due to frame design/construction, rear axle, springs, and shocks? Just wonder what is different that allows you to have 1540 additional lbs. of payload.