OK, obviously that's a long lever you're hanging a pretty heavy weight on. Any chance you'd bring it in a little? I'm assuming the extra length is for the gas cans. You could drop the cans a bit and tilt the tire towards the back of the vehicle, allowing you to shorten the arm and maybe reduce the leveraging. I definitely think the tie-in to the frame at another point is necessary.
I think you would be surprised at how much all the stuff will flex dragging it on the trail. I have stood over a number of brands of bumpers as the tail end gets dragged over the ground or rocks as a truck starts to climb a obstacle and even the strongest designs flex alot.
You are going to need alot more clearence at the body or it will make its own clearence.
Maybe a rubber stopper on the body to prevent a little sway (maybe with a larger backing)? If the stopper is on the swingaway, it would likely trash the paint and dent the door.
landed on my rear bumper pretty hard yesterday and it didn't budge, fyi... also found out my newer slider design doesn't bend when coming down from 2'.
Sorry, I think our terminology is mixed up. I was talking about the arm that the tire mounts to. It extends pretty far from the rear of the vehicle, adding even more leverage on the mounting points. From what I can see, the tire will be vertical. By tipping the top of the tire back towards the vehicle as much as you practically can, you could offset the leveraging to some degree by moving some of the weight over the hinge. By lowering the cans a bit, you can give yourself some room to do this. Does that make any sense?I'm not quite following you here.
The arm is the length it needs to be to span the door width so that the other stanchion on the driver's side doesn't block the door from opening. And yes, needed for the gas cans too. I tried to see if I could squeeze some cans between the tire and door as I'd seen elsewhere, but there's not enough clearance. The tire is as close as it can get to the swing arm, leaving room for a 255 or 285 in the future. And there's only about 3" between the swing and the back door. I have confirmed that the tire is outside of the departure angle line. I had thought about making the arm for the tire adjustable in length. Kinda wish I had but it's a little late now.
But that chassis mount will still be part of the system, will it not? My concern is that unless you add umpteen million pounds of metal to the slider/bumper system, you will still have a little flex.Anyway, the issue isn't any of the arm lengths involved. Those chassis mounts are really, really flexible. Just with the tow bar bolted to the bumper, I was able to move it just by pulling on the tow bar with my arms.
That's what I was thinking was to install a backing plate- perhaps to the holes where the original spare mount went, and then installing the stopper onto it. By limiting the flex before it starts, you would limit the amount of damage it could do. I've see a lot of very beefy and well-engineered tire carriers move a substantial amount off-road.I thought about that, but I really think this needs to be solved at the frame. A bumper might stop the tire from moving going down the road, but when hitting things offroad, it would just kill the door.
Sorry, I think our terminology is mixed up. I was talking about the arm that the tire mounts to. It extends pretty far from the rear of the vehicle, adding even more leverage on the mounting points. From what I can see, the tire will be vertical. By tipping the top of the tire back towards the vehicle as much as you practically can, you could offset the leveraging to some degree by moving some of the weight over the hinge. By lowering the cans a bit, you can give yourself some room to do this. Does that make any sense?
But that chassis mount will still be part of the system, will it not? My concern is that unless you add umpteen million pounds of metal to the slider/bumper system, you will still have a little flex.
That's what I was thinking was to install a backing plate- perhaps to the holes where the original spare mount went, and then installing the stopper onto it. By limiting the flex before it starts, you would limit the amount of damage it could do. I've see a lot of very beefy and well-engineered tire carriers move a substantial amount off-road.
Chris, do you mean across the top of the main beam? If so, actually that part is fine and we got lucky on the Disco. That's actually a rubber strip meant to close in the gap between the body and factory bumper. No issue there.
I've thought about gusseting the bottom of the hinge too, just wasn't sure if it would really be required. The hinge plates are 1/4", pretty stout. I'll probably do the bottom, but there's not practical way to do the top that I can see.
Sorry, I think our terminology is mixed up. I was talking about the arm that the tire mounts to. It extends pretty far from the rear of the vehicle, adding even more leverage on the mounting points. From what I can see, the tire will be vertical. By tipping the top of the tire back towards the vehicle as much as you practically can, you could offset the leveraging to some degree by moving some of the weight over the hinge. By lowering the cans a bit, you can give yourself some room to do this. Does that make any sense?