Pskhaat
2005 Expedition Trophy Champion
GM and Chrysler are on the loosing side of that curve,
Chrysler on the losing side or Cummins?
GM and Chrysler are on the loosing side of that curve,
I would like to see some detuners so gain some reliability back. maybe some more MPG too.
And I agree that the numbers are crazy, that enough is already enough, and decreasing reliability to get some sort of advantage at the urinal trough is stupid...
OTOH, I've ordered a 2011 Ford PSD
...how about make this vehicle last for...IDK, how about 20years/2 million miles before needing an engine or tranny???
You mean like the design specs of a LandCruiser :victory:
You mean like the design specs of a LandCruiser :victory:
I was just about to say the same thing!!
'82 diesel Land Cruiser pushing 350,000 miles (600,000kms). Purchased in '88 and used as the family vehicle and daily driver most of the time. I'd drive it across the continent today if I had a need or reason to and not worry about breakdowns. Driven for MPG I can get 25mpg. I can drive from Canada to Mexico on two tanks of fuel (and have some left over). I've towed my FJ45LV from Guatemala City, Guatemala to San Jose, Costa Rica (not fast but so what). I can head out wheeling with most moderately built rigs, but I try to avoid abusing my truck.
Show me ONE current production vehicle available in North America that can do what this will?
Both vehicles share the 3.0L Mercedes. The Jeep unfortuntely has a 5 speed tranny so it has higher rpms than the 7 speed ML350 at highway speeds.
So your Jeep has the 5 speed auto??
I really wish they would offer the Jeep/MB diesel in the states with a 5..or 6speed manual!!:wings:
How about tow a camper and still knock down 30-35MPGs! That would get MY attention!