I've been a member for a while but I don't post much.
I just finished an epic marathon reading this entire thread in one sitting. . . a fracture in your spine provides ample opportunity for reading. I must say, although sad for the pain the latest "chapters" of this thread has brought, this reads better than any fiction being written by a major publishing house.
My sympathies to Mike at the “loss” of the “Jensen”. Hindsight and all that, something as unique as this was perhaps been better thought of as a collector edition versus a travel model? Or at least better suited for a dry versus wet climate?
So although I didn’t see the benefit (function) versus value (cost) and it always felt like $$$ was no issue - (when you sign the checks, you get what YOU want ) … handcrafted exotic woods for the interior of an expedition vehicle in the Northwest? Why not! And then I read further…
Then, when Mike announced he was going to "improve" upon the previous work - I thought "oh no! How can you tear that up?" (Arguing with myself over the idea of keeping the "Jensen" alive for future generations to drool over.) And then I read further…
I can attest to having been distraught over the destruction of the Wrangler (ER). As an object of art whose wonderful craftsmanship was being torn apart, it candidly also aligned with my confusion over why make something too aesthetically beautiful when, while visiting mother nature, she'll all but guarantee that it will get torn up, ruined or broken. At least that was what I was thinking as the story developed around Paul's work. And then I read further…
Okay, salvage the old ER model with a new AEV-modified Wrangler. Makes sense. And then I read further …
Torn up indeed. As in who compares themselves to Nicholas Tesla ? (okay, Elon Musk) But ******? I would ask if too much fiberglass resin was inhaled but obviously the story suggests not near enough was applied.
Freaking everybody has dreams. But to suggest that “I did this so I could follow my dreams and create something so radically different than what is being produced today.” is pure Iowan manure. What was going to be so radical (lying about business activities certainly isn’t). Creating a roof that rises on both sides has certainly been done before. Radically different is original. And other than the versions of the stories passed along to Mike to convince him this wasn’t a hole in the water in which to continue throwing more $$$, this is just another very sad story of someone’s trust and likely generosity being taken advantage of. Nothing original there. And then I read further …
Other than maybe envy? A member is considerate enough to share his experiences in creating a one-off rig and someone tries to grow a pair – on line no less – and “attempt” to rip the OP on his decisions?
There are those of us who were fortunate enough to be raised with class. And then, well their comments speak for themselves.