D
DiscoD
Guest
Okay, things have gone just a bit too far.
Steve Young,
I don't want you to think I'm attacking you; I'm not. I'm not here to start a flame war or personally "bash" you, and I'm not some goon only coming around to spread insults.
But, I do see a few holes in your already questionable past, or, Never Ending Story. Can I call you Valcore?
What struck me as odd, and what influenced me to post, is your story about your HAM licensing. You claimed that the only reason you posted a bogus call sign is because you were pressured to do so by some "nosy" attention seekers.
I remember this topic differently. I don't think I need to go into very much detail, so I'll just post the link to the thread on www.discoweb.org where you did post a call sign. http://www.discoweb.org/forums/showthread.php?t=6435
Within that post on Discoweb, you volunteered a call sign, KA9AID. This call sign comes back to a Steven C. Young, yet you spell your name Stephen.
This is not a big deal since you've already stated that you posted a bogus call sign. I can't explain why you posted a bogus call sign, but you did and you've fessed up.
However, what I find stranger than you actually posting a bogus call sign is how you got offended when people called your bluff. If you were only joking around when you posted a bogus call sign you would not get offended when someone busted you. If you were doing this to be funny, you would have laughed it off. But this was not the case. You got offended. You got mad that someone questioned you. If you were only joking around, fine - hahaha. But you decided to reply with a voice such as this: http://www.landroversonly.com/forums/f3/ham-radios-16302/index5.html#post155499
That's not joking around; that's covering you ***. Or, at least, attempting to. You did not come out and say "hahaha". You only added to your already growing lie.
It was not just one post, either, you got upset in. You continued to grow your lies one-post-after-another. It goes on-and-on. You continuity tried to convince Mike R that you were in fact a HAM and that your call sign was KA9AID.
That's not normal.
Another thing that you have called attention to is your work history. I even think you've claimed to be an owner, or part owner, in D.A.P. I don't believe this to be correct. Can you comment on that? Are you Al and Penny's partner in crime?
What about your previous work history? Again, I'm not calling you out and I'm only calling it how I see it. I see it as more bogus information. You've claimed to be a "former electronic warfare and communications officer". You've also claimed to be in security within the Air Force assigned to guarding Air Force 1. You've claimed to be into computers while in the military. You claim to have been a SAR trainer. You claim to work hand-and-hand with local law enforcement and fire departments, and you've even stated that the local authorities have called you personally to assist in emergencies in your Land Rover.
What I've found is that you add a little something else to your stories to enlarge your pee-pee, such as in this thread. When you say "I was called out" you are speaking of yourself. You're not talking about a group of people or an agency, you are talking in first person. I learned this about you from your posts. You do it a lot. I have no doubt that you may have been involved with a stuck tractor-trailer on the Interstate during snowy conditions. I'm not arguing that you sat in the vehicle the entire time. But the "I was called out" part of your statement is what throws a lot of people off. I know no one called Steve Young. It does not work that way. It never has. I don't care how busy an agency gets, they're not going to pick up a phone and call Steve Young to come assist traffic on the Interstate during foul whether. Could you only imagine the liability? And we all know how you like to talk about liability, Steve.
1
2
3
Just search Steve Young Liability for more. I could go on for pages....
But what's relevant is that to Steve Young, item such as bumpers, shocks, brake pads, etc... are all liability issues, but the State Police calling Joe The Traffic Cop is not. It does not add up and it's certainly not feasible.
Now, in this traffic cop situation Steve was probably part of a fire or rescue agency. Instead of "I got called to", it's more like "my agency got called to" a stuck tractor-trailer. That sounds a whole lot more logical. That sounds believable. That's common operating procedure. But that's not how Steve words his posts. Steve adds a little extra in there. That little extra adds a little bit more pee-pee to Steve's already swelling head.....er, pee-pee
You can find a lot more examples like this when Steve talks about D.A.P. Steve will mention stuff in his posts like, "I've got three TJM bumpers in stock. Call me for a special price"; or, "I just ordered a container load of NATO Jerry Cans and I will beat anyone's price".
For the person who does not know any better, they would think Steve is the owner of D.A.P. But like I said, I don't think this is the case.
Steve has also claimed to own a lot of different vehicles. Maybe he has, I don't know. Really, I don't care and I agree with Steve that it's no ones business. Who cares? So what...
But there is one thing that strikes me as odd here, too. Steve claims to be Mr. Land Rover. Steve drives Land Rovers, works on Land Rovers, attends Land Rover events, works at a place that retails Land Rover parts, posts/reads Land Rover forums, and buys Land Rover toys. Steve bleeds green. Steve has one life and he's living it. So, Steve is Mr. Land Rover.
Now, I don't mind telling you that I've had several Discovery's. I can tell you that I've had a green one, a white one, a grey one, and a black one, all of varying years. Who gives a ****?
But there is a certain marque with the Defender crowd. The Defender crowd is different. Look at www.d-90.com. Notice how all the Defender owners post as to what # Defender they own or have owned. This is typical of Defender owners. It's pride.
But for some reason Mr. Land Rover Steve has always avoided the question, "What number Defender 110 did you own?". Steve has never answered this question. I think that's strange. The D-110 is a rare breed. If you own, or have ever owned, a D-110, you know what number it was. It's not like remembering your VIN number on your Discovery. It's a number somewhere between 1 and 500. That number becomes etched in your memory. Those pictures of your D-90/110 are displayed proudly in your photo albums, even more so if you bleed green and live your one life.
So I find it very strange Steve, Mr. Land Rover, will not post this information. Perhaps it's because he knows these D-110's are too easy to track once the number is obtained. Who knows....
As for Freelanders, who cares. It's a joke of a car. If some people like them, who cares. The proof is in the pudding. I never saw a Freelander complete the Rubicon or climb Rattle Rock at the Windrock OHV park. I never saw the Freelander cross Iceland or spend months in the bush of Africa. The Freelander was a commuter car and it even failed at that. Are "70%" still on the road today? I have a gut feeling that there is not (at least in the USA). I seldom even see them any longer.
One last thing and I'm calling it quits.
Steve claims to "wheel hard". Steve claimed to wheel his Freelander hard and claims to raise a little hell in his Disco(s). Maybe he does, I don't know. I've never seen him complete as much as a dirt road at the MAR event in his Rovers. Steve has always been far too busy to wheel when I'm around. Packing up his roof-top-tent, helping with children games, sniffing Bill Burke's armpit, etc... I've never actually seen Steve Young "wheel hard" a vehicle. But Steve claims to wheel hard.
All of us could probably post some pictures of our truck(s) in a compromising position. Even if you do not "wheel hard", it happens. I know Steve rolled his Freelander once and that was funny. But what was even funnier is that he rolled on flat ground; two of his wheels went into a ditch while the other two were on flat ground. That's funny right there, I don't care who you are. But that's it. I have never seen Steve or one of his trucks on a "hard" trail or heard of Steve going to some remote places where trails are commonly known as "hard".
But Steve "wheels hard"?
Steve has been into Land Rovers a lot longer than I have. According to Steve, he has been places I could only dream of seeing. According to Steve, he knows what he's doing and has experience to back it up. But where is the proof? Where are the eye witnesses? Where are the pictures? We know Steve has a Camera because he often talks about the many Nikon's he's owned. Steve has even told others how to use their cameras and recommended cameras to others. So certainly Steve takes pictures, right?
Just like when Steve was asked to provide a few names of "trainers" who enjoy the Freelander, Steve turns the other cheek when asked for proof of his wheeling experience. Steve thinks people are out to get him or something. We're all after him. But really, Steve, honestly....people are only curious. If you claim to have wheeled a "hard" trail in Maine, people would like to see it. That's why we buy magazines. That's why we read these forums. We like to see pics and we like to see these vehicles do amazing things. But you take offense to that even though you bleed green.
It just gets a little weird sometimes, Steve. Just a little too unbelievable.
Steve Young,
I don't want you to think I'm attacking you; I'm not. I'm not here to start a flame war or personally "bash" you, and I'm not some goon only coming around to spread insults.
But, I do see a few holes in your already questionable past, or, Never Ending Story. Can I call you Valcore?
What struck me as odd, and what influenced me to post, is your story about your HAM licensing. You claimed that the only reason you posted a bogus call sign is because you were pressured to do so by some "nosy" attention seekers.
I remember this topic differently. I don't think I need to go into very much detail, so I'll just post the link to the thread on www.discoweb.org where you did post a call sign. http://www.discoweb.org/forums/showthread.php?t=6435
Within that post on Discoweb, you volunteered a call sign, KA9AID. This call sign comes back to a Steven C. Young, yet you spell your name Stephen.
This is not a big deal since you've already stated that you posted a bogus call sign. I can't explain why you posted a bogus call sign, but you did and you've fessed up.
However, what I find stranger than you actually posting a bogus call sign is how you got offended when people called your bluff. If you were only joking around when you posted a bogus call sign you would not get offended when someone busted you. If you were doing this to be funny, you would have laughed it off. But this was not the case. You got offended. You got mad that someone questioned you. If you were only joking around, fine - hahaha. But you decided to reply with a voice such as this: http://www.landroversonly.com/forums/f3/ham-radios-16302/index5.html#post155499
That's not joking around; that's covering you ***. Or, at least, attempting to. You did not come out and say "hahaha". You only added to your already growing lie.
It was not just one post, either, you got upset in. You continued to grow your lies one-post-after-another. It goes on-and-on. You continuity tried to convince Mike R that you were in fact a HAM and that your call sign was KA9AID.
That's not normal.
Another thing that you have called attention to is your work history. I even think you've claimed to be an owner, or part owner, in D.A.P. I don't believe this to be correct. Can you comment on that? Are you Al and Penny's partner in crime?
What about your previous work history? Again, I'm not calling you out and I'm only calling it how I see it. I see it as more bogus information. You've claimed to be a "former electronic warfare and communications officer". You've also claimed to be in security within the Air Force assigned to guarding Air Force 1. You've claimed to be into computers while in the military. You claim to have been a SAR trainer. You claim to work hand-and-hand with local law enforcement and fire departments, and you've even stated that the local authorities have called you personally to assist in emergencies in your Land Rover.
What I've found is that you add a little something else to your stories to enlarge your pee-pee, such as in this thread. When you say "I was called out" you are speaking of yourself. You're not talking about a group of people or an agency, you are talking in first person. I learned this about you from your posts. You do it a lot. I have no doubt that you may have been involved with a stuck tractor-trailer on the Interstate during snowy conditions. I'm not arguing that you sat in the vehicle the entire time. But the "I was called out" part of your statement is what throws a lot of people off. I know no one called Steve Young. It does not work that way. It never has. I don't care how busy an agency gets, they're not going to pick up a phone and call Steve Young to come assist traffic on the Interstate during foul whether. Could you only imagine the liability? And we all know how you like to talk about liability, Steve.
1
2
3
Just search Steve Young Liability for more. I could go on for pages....
But what's relevant is that to Steve Young, item such as bumpers, shocks, brake pads, etc... are all liability issues, but the State Police calling Joe The Traffic Cop is not. It does not add up and it's certainly not feasible.
Now, in this traffic cop situation Steve was probably part of a fire or rescue agency. Instead of "I got called to", it's more like "my agency got called to" a stuck tractor-trailer. That sounds a whole lot more logical. That sounds believable. That's common operating procedure. But that's not how Steve words his posts. Steve adds a little extra in there. That little extra adds a little bit more pee-pee to Steve's already swelling head.....er, pee-pee
You can find a lot more examples like this when Steve talks about D.A.P. Steve will mention stuff in his posts like, "I've got three TJM bumpers in stock. Call me for a special price"; or, "I just ordered a container load of NATO Jerry Cans and I will beat anyone's price".
For the person who does not know any better, they would think Steve is the owner of D.A.P. But like I said, I don't think this is the case.
Steve has also claimed to own a lot of different vehicles. Maybe he has, I don't know. Really, I don't care and I agree with Steve that it's no ones business. Who cares? So what...
But there is one thing that strikes me as odd here, too. Steve claims to be Mr. Land Rover. Steve drives Land Rovers, works on Land Rovers, attends Land Rover events, works at a place that retails Land Rover parts, posts/reads Land Rover forums, and buys Land Rover toys. Steve bleeds green. Steve has one life and he's living it. So, Steve is Mr. Land Rover.
Now, I don't mind telling you that I've had several Discovery's. I can tell you that I've had a green one, a white one, a grey one, and a black one, all of varying years. Who gives a ****?
But there is a certain marque with the Defender crowd. The Defender crowd is different. Look at www.d-90.com. Notice how all the Defender owners post as to what # Defender they own or have owned. This is typical of Defender owners. It's pride.
But for some reason Mr. Land Rover Steve has always avoided the question, "What number Defender 110 did you own?". Steve has never answered this question. I think that's strange. The D-110 is a rare breed. If you own, or have ever owned, a D-110, you know what number it was. It's not like remembering your VIN number on your Discovery. It's a number somewhere between 1 and 500. That number becomes etched in your memory. Those pictures of your D-90/110 are displayed proudly in your photo albums, even more so if you bleed green and live your one life.
So I find it very strange Steve, Mr. Land Rover, will not post this information. Perhaps it's because he knows these D-110's are too easy to track once the number is obtained. Who knows....
As for Freelanders, who cares. It's a joke of a car. If some people like them, who cares. The proof is in the pudding. I never saw a Freelander complete the Rubicon or climb Rattle Rock at the Windrock OHV park. I never saw the Freelander cross Iceland or spend months in the bush of Africa. The Freelander was a commuter car and it even failed at that. Are "70%" still on the road today? I have a gut feeling that there is not (at least in the USA). I seldom even see them any longer.
One last thing and I'm calling it quits.
Steve claims to "wheel hard". Steve claimed to wheel his Freelander hard and claims to raise a little hell in his Disco(s). Maybe he does, I don't know. I've never seen him complete as much as a dirt road at the MAR event in his Rovers. Steve has always been far too busy to wheel when I'm around. Packing up his roof-top-tent, helping with children games, sniffing Bill Burke's armpit, etc... I've never actually seen Steve Young "wheel hard" a vehicle. But Steve claims to wheel hard.
All of us could probably post some pictures of our truck(s) in a compromising position. Even if you do not "wheel hard", it happens. I know Steve rolled his Freelander once and that was funny. But what was even funnier is that he rolled on flat ground; two of his wheels went into a ditch while the other two were on flat ground. That's funny right there, I don't care who you are. But that's it. I have never seen Steve or one of his trucks on a "hard" trail or heard of Steve going to some remote places where trails are commonly known as "hard".
But Steve "wheels hard"?
Steve has been into Land Rovers a lot longer than I have. According to Steve, he has been places I could only dream of seeing. According to Steve, he knows what he's doing and has experience to back it up. But where is the proof? Where are the eye witnesses? Where are the pictures? We know Steve has a Camera because he often talks about the many Nikon's he's owned. Steve has even told others how to use their cameras and recommended cameras to others. So certainly Steve takes pictures, right?
Just like when Steve was asked to provide a few names of "trainers" who enjoy the Freelander, Steve turns the other cheek when asked for proof of his wheeling experience. Steve thinks people are out to get him or something. We're all after him. But really, Steve, honestly....people are only curious. If you claim to have wheeled a "hard" trail in Maine, people would like to see it. That's why we buy magazines. That's why we read these forums. We like to see pics and we like to see these vehicles do amazing things. But you take offense to that even though you bleed green.
It just gets a little weird sometimes, Steve. Just a little too unbelievable.
