Jonathan Hanson
Well-known member
Beilieve me, I'd be all in favor of an IQ test before someone can buy an ATV or a gun, but I don't think that one will fly.
Part of what we're dealing with here is the simple downside of living in a free society. Start down that slope of testing, education, permits, and restrictions, and you wind up in England, where personal freedoms are vanishing (and the crime rate is soaring).
Gun control advocates often point to automobiles as an example of licensing and testing, to which I always simply respond, "And how many licensed drivers do you know who shouldn't be driving?" Licensed drivers kill more people every year than unlicensed gun owners. Bad example.
Actually, I would be totally in favor of a nationwide firearms owner license. You take a course, pass a background check, get fingerprinted, certify at a range that you are competent. Then - that's it, no more restrictions. No magazine capacity limits, no one gun per month purchasing, carry it however you like. Want a full-auto HK MP5? No problem. But that one won't fly either.
I'm afraid that the only way to control much of the behavior we've been discussing is punitive. All of the people involved know that trespassing is wrong. Most know they can't shoot within 1/4 mile of buildings. They know they shouldn't throw Bud Lite cans on the ground. They don't care. You walk up and in your friendly manner point out that littering is rude and they'll laugh at you. Hit 'em with a $500 fine and they stop laughing.
Part of what we're dealing with here is the simple downside of living in a free society. Start down that slope of testing, education, permits, and restrictions, and you wind up in England, where personal freedoms are vanishing (and the crime rate is soaring).
Gun control advocates often point to automobiles as an example of licensing and testing, to which I always simply respond, "And how many licensed drivers do you know who shouldn't be driving?" Licensed drivers kill more people every year than unlicensed gun owners. Bad example.
Actually, I would be totally in favor of a nationwide firearms owner license. You take a course, pass a background check, get fingerprinted, certify at a range that you are competent. Then - that's it, no more restrictions. No magazine capacity limits, no one gun per month purchasing, carry it however you like. Want a full-auto HK MP5? No problem. But that one won't fly either.
I'm afraid that the only way to control much of the behavior we've been discussing is punitive. All of the people involved know that trespassing is wrong. Most know they can't shoot within 1/4 mile of buildings. They know they shouldn't throw Bud Lite cans on the ground. They don't care. You walk up and in your friendly manner point out that littering is rude and they'll laugh at you. Hit 'em with a $500 fine and they stop laughing.