And then there is this: $$$$$ http://www.toyotaofbatavia.com/new/...-batavia-f1e2dd310a0e0ae77546168a97c48745.htm
.
There's more too it that just that. Given the Tacoma's 15mpg and 21 gallon tank (a rough 300 mile range) you'll pass everything but a gas station. As mentioned for me personally HAVING to fill up EVERY week or sooner just to go back and forth to work sucked. The diesel even getting just 25mpg will allow me a range of at least 500 miles, will stretch me to every other week, much more reasonable IMO and you can't relate that time saved and convenience a direct monetary value.
.
Also I'm not interested in a full size truck so there are no other options for me For the OP that may be relevant though.
The 4.0L is a great engine. One of the more noticeable advantages of the 3.5L is the new 6-speed automatic transmission. It keeps the motor in the meat of the power band for more of the acceleration cycle, so this truck really does feel strong. I still cannot believe the fuel economy in stock form. We could get 24mpg at 55mph. The biggest test for the drivetrain will be when we load these trucks up with accessories and larger tires. I am curious how that will affect the mileage.
There is an aftermarket tank for the Gen 2 Tundra. Something like 46 gallons?
I'm not sold on diesels, either. Especially now with all the garbage you've got to deal with. I do love the range, but you don't need a diesel to get range. (I've got a 36 gal tank in my gas truck, which is nice to have).
.
I know on some older Tacomas, people retrofit F150 tanks on there for more capacity. (Although that means a Ford part in a Toyota!!). If that's not an option, I'd rather spend $1-2k on a rear bumper and put a couple of cans of gas on there.
I am currently building exactly what you describe, check the build in my sig!
Can you retrofit the older Gen 2 Tundras that had the smaller tank with the larger one?
...If they didn't have DEF...I would be all over it....
Na, you wouldn't....