coopdog and Viridis,
I don’t know you guys from Adam, but I find it odd that you are both new members who have joined only to comment on this debacle. It also seems that you are both in solid support of Inka and their practices. Viridis, you seem to be pretty calm about the fact that your deposit is likely gone never to return. I am not saying either of you are Inka propagandists, but you must admit the timing and similar stories is a bit sketch.
As far as the original intentions, I could honestly care less at this point. There is no fair and balanced. He used money from previous deposits not to secure materials or capital for my trailer, but to pay for people and equipment for people who ordered a year or more before. That is pretty much the definition of a pyramid scheme. I do not care if they were honest mistakes or not. They offered a product, took the money, and failed to deliver. That’s theft, pure and simple. You want to make it right? Great, get your rich family involved and sell off personal assets. Should I believe that $250k of deposits and another $350k just disappeared into thin air? I’m not a businessman by any means, but to take that kind of loss with this much demand and NOTHING (publicly) to show for it is the epitome of folly.
Do what you have to to get deposits back or answer for it in a civil and/or criminal court. Period. You stole from us, Mike, give the money back and it’s over. Inka is finished, it is highly toxic and untouchable by investors now because of years of mismanagement.
Pathfinder7, you are right. I am a new member (although I have been reading the forum on and off for about 2 years), and I joined the forum specifically to comment on the Inka situation. I have never posted to any forum before, because, frankly, I'm not very computer-savvy. I use my computer chiefly for email and to research camping equipment. I chose to post to this forum because (1) it addressed a topic that directly affected me, and (2) I felt moved to share my perspective, even though I knew that my viewpoints might be met with hostility, based on previous posts I had read. Seeing coopdog's post gave me the courage to express my opinions.
Despite your suspicions, I am indeed a customer, who, like you, finds myself without a camper and several thousand dollars poorer. I don't know how I could prove this to you, and I'm not going to try. I do
NOT support Inka's business practices, as you stated, because those practices are at least partly responsible for the very painful situation in which we all find ourselves. I support your right to be angry and to express that anger. I support your right to a full refund. I would prefer a camper, but that would be my choice, assuming such a choice were available. What I cannot support is the tone that some of the posts on this thread have adopted. One person criticized Martyn of AT, calling him a "shill" for expressing concern for both sides of this debacle. Another suggested marching on Inka with pitchforks and torches. Really?! I understand (or at least, hope) that the pitchforks and torches suggestion was metaphorical. Still, I think we would all benefit by keeping our posts civil and constructive.
We are each entitled to our own opinions and feelings. The purpose of my initial post was to share my personal experiences and to express my opinion that I do not believe that Mike accepted our deposits to deliberately defraud us, as some have insinuated. From a financial standpoint, I agree with you, Pathfinder7. Regardless of intention, we are out a bunch of money, and that isn't right or fair. You are angry; I am bitterly disappointed. I respect your feelings; I hope that my feelings will also be respected.