Not exactly the same as you, but I removed my front swaybar when upgrading my Tacoma, and I actually prefer not to have it.
It does drive differently though. Just be aware of that.
When that deer jumps out in front of you, you want every handling advantage you can get
It's important to know your limitations, so you don't have a worse accident while trying to avoid one. Slamming on the brakes is the first order of business. Only let off the brake and dodge carefully... if necessary and possible. I did that once in a car when it was a wide open area so I could see the deer in advance, and there was no traffic. The two times I've hit a deer with my truck I had no time to react at all.
At any rate, my truck without swaybars and with upgraded shocks excels at sudden maneuvers. The damping is very high and digressive... which means the shocks are stiff in slow speed movements like maneuvering quickly, yet respond well to bumps. Swaybars are undamped springs that resist independent wheel movement. This negatively effects the ride and handling on any uneven surface... and they just plain suck offroad or on rough pavement. Whatever one wheel expereinces gets immediately transfered to the opposite side... lateral jolts and lurching. The only advantage they offer is flatter cornering on sweeping turns. That does not necessarily make them more stable though even in that scenario, unless your shock damping is insufficient. I have no experience with the OPs OMEs, so I can't specifically vouch for them, however.
Rockcrawlers want weak damping, long travel, and massive articulation. They'd wallow around like crazy on the street if they used the same setup there.
I lean to the digressive most times.
When I first heard about the different valving schemes I didn't think digressive made sense... but that's because I didn't understand it. The damping curve is vs speed, not travel. I'm a big fan after experiencing it.
I grew up with shocks and different damping rates 50 years ago drag racing.... Rear shocks were engineered to be firm and hold the rear of the car high during load transfer. Front shocks were engineered to drop fast as the front end lifted under acceleration off the starting line then resist as the cars front end wanted to come back down to earth, keeping the weight transfer to the rear.When I first heard about the different valving schemes I didn't think digressive made sense... but that's because I didn't understand it. The damping curve is vs speed, not travel. I'm a big fan after experiencing it.
You can control sway 2 ways, with stiff springs and shock that slow the action or with soft springs, soft shocks and sway bars. The stiff route leads to a rough ride.
With the dampening increased in the rear the truck is more stable, close to if I had the sway bar attached. I personally like the additional body roll without the sway bar, so I typically leave the dampening soft on the rear.