Well… will try address the issues presented above one by one:
-
Hideout: We do not believe in deceive, hence we never pretend to be 'users'.
-
Product test: Along the Pillowtrack R&D process we had tested it (and its various versions) in many terrain and recovery conditions. Obviously not every terrain type and every recovery situation could be simulated with every vehicle. We are aware of product limitations; caused by technology, cost and pure physics, and constantly try to improve. Users experience from around the world is the driver from improvements – we more than welcome this constructive feedback.
-
Review: As much as we try not too many will accept OUR product review to be independent. Never the less, this thread might be useful.
http://www.northwestoverlandsociety...orumid/1/postid/37191/view/topic/Default.aspx
-
Pillowtracks Vs. Bridging Ladders: Comparing the two is not an easy task as they serve different users in different situations (see following post). In a nutshell: Bridging ladders lack the lifting (jacking) ability. E.g: when stuck on a high center, a flat Pillowtrack could be inserted under the free-spinning wheel, and then inflated to lift the chassis while regaining traction. Every explorer knows his vehicle (weight, tiers etc.), storage limitations and expected terrain conditions. Pillowtrack is continuously improved to cover as many of these situations.
-
Rollover: Misuse of any recovery device could be dangerous: cars have fallen off hi-jacks, torn by winches and more. Using the Pillowtracks not according to instructions might end up sadly. For example Pillowtracks should not be used on side slopes, but there is no rollover issue when using them as trench fillers or in wheel articulation situations.
Pillowtracks offer a slightly different recovery/mobility perspective – I will present it in another post (this one got to long already)
Pillowtrack