DesertRose
Safari Chick & Supporting Sponsor
Okay, I have the Seven-Year Itch. Not to replace Jonathan, but possibly my Tacoma.
Why?
- I thought it would be interesting to try to find a real 'ecological' and 'economical' vehicle that is comfortable on the highway, easy enough to drive in the city, and could be used for overlanding (we already own a superb FJ40 and a project Land Rover 88).
- I do this every once in a while (swap vehicles) - I love vehicles, especially 4x4s, and though I adore my Tacoma, it has its faults: poor gas economy for its size, seats only 2, and the cargo area is inconvenient (I loved the convenience of my 4-door FJ55, for example).
So in the spirit of some recent discussions in the Conservation section about environmentally conscious overlanding, I wanted to see if it was possible to find a truck that fit my criteria.
Below is a list of criteria, and my true secret goal revealed. :roost:
ECO-OVERLANDER PROJECT
“Economical & Ecological Overlanding Vehicle”
Primary Goal:
Secret Goal:
Criteria for new vehicle:
Thinking smaller-looking might be more economical, I started looking at things like the Isuzu Vehi-Cross and the Tourag, but was shocked to find out (duh) they are really very heavy and aimed at performance rather than economy. I seriously considered them - SO much fun! - but could not justify cruddy fuel economy. No point in losing the value of my Taco to that.
Then I started looking at cross-overs like RAV4s and CR-Vs, but again - check out the attached PDF chart (I'm a nerd) - they are not that economical. (I include an index factor for economy to compare mileage economy between diesel and gas.)
Chart of comparisons for Eco-Overland "Lites"
Then I looked at vehicles that were diesel - the Liberty - or the Suzukis that can be pretty easily converted to VW diesels. Now we see real economy here.
But the Liberty blows my budget, and frankly, I'm not sure I like the styling all that much. Ironically, Jeep is pleased because the Liberty is appealing to women because they say women want a smaller-sized but still-macho looking SUV, and my reaction is that it's too "cute" and I prefer a Land Cruiser overall . . . maybe it's because I just spent a few weeks driving Jonathan's gorgeous FJ40 nearly every day, and really, really enjoyed it . . . especially the expedition feel, and yes, the coolness and attention I got (I loved all the thumbs-ups and the 'dude' signs I got!).
The Zukes are very neat - tons and tons of cool accessories, with little ARBs (dare I say 'darling?') and racks and lockers, too. But safety and noise on the highway are a huge minus - they're pretty tinny. The Vitaras are better . . . but priced a little high for doing the swap to diesel, which would cost about $4K to do it right. Also, VW diesels have pretty low HP and torque (except the TDI, which are much harder to swap).
So what I'm finding is that the more modern these "small SUVs" have gotten, the heavier, the more powerful, and the more gas-guzzling they have gotten (though more safe). They're not economical at all.
Where to go next?
Any input anyone?
What am I missing?
Frankly I'm leaning back to what got me started on this to begin with: Find a nice FJ60 with a blown engine and replace it with a Toyota diesel . . . or import an Aussie diesel Land Cruiser for $10,000 or so . . . and then I should meet most of my criteria . . . that's the next phase of research now!
Why?
- I thought it would be interesting to try to find a real 'ecological' and 'economical' vehicle that is comfortable on the highway, easy enough to drive in the city, and could be used for overlanding (we already own a superb FJ40 and a project Land Rover 88).
- I do this every once in a while (swap vehicles) - I love vehicles, especially 4x4s, and though I adore my Tacoma, it has its faults: poor gas economy for its size, seats only 2, and the cargo area is inconvenient (I loved the convenience of my 4-door FJ55, for example).
So in the spirit of some recent discussions in the Conservation section about environmentally conscious overlanding, I wanted to see if it was possible to find a truck that fit my criteria.
Below is a list of criteria, and my true secret goal revealed. :roost:
ECO-OVERLANDER PROJECT
“Economical & Ecological Overlanding Vehicle”
Primary Goal:
- Replace 2000 4WD Tacoma TRD (V6, Xcab,188K miles, OME, rear-locker, ARE topper, ARB)
- Est. sale price $11,000
- Est. sale price $11,000
Secret Goal:
- Have enough $ left over to buy a 250cc dual-sport moto :luxhello:
Criteria for new vehicle:
- Must be high-fuel-economy (i.e. - over 30 mpg average if possible; I don't consider 20 mpg to be remotely economical under my definition)
- Diesel or able to convert to diesel a major plus
- Seating for four
- Prefer 4WD or AWD; low-range very desirable but necessary? not sure
- Comfortable on highway
- Airbags
- NHTSA rating 4-5 a big plus
- Diesel or able to convert to diesel a major plus
- Seating for four
- Prefer 4WD or AWD; low-range very desirable but necessary? not sure
- Comfortable on highway
- Airbags
- NHTSA rating 4-5 a big plus
Thinking smaller-looking might be more economical, I started looking at things like the Isuzu Vehi-Cross and the Tourag, but was shocked to find out (duh) they are really very heavy and aimed at performance rather than economy. I seriously considered them - SO much fun! - but could not justify cruddy fuel economy. No point in losing the value of my Taco to that.
Then I started looking at cross-overs like RAV4s and CR-Vs, but again - check out the attached PDF chart (I'm a nerd) - they are not that economical. (I include an index factor for economy to compare mileage economy between diesel and gas.)
Chart of comparisons for Eco-Overland "Lites"
Then I looked at vehicles that were diesel - the Liberty - or the Suzukis that can be pretty easily converted to VW diesels. Now we see real economy here.
But the Liberty blows my budget, and frankly, I'm not sure I like the styling all that much. Ironically, Jeep is pleased because the Liberty is appealing to women because they say women want a smaller-sized but still-macho looking SUV, and my reaction is that it's too "cute" and I prefer a Land Cruiser overall . . . maybe it's because I just spent a few weeks driving Jonathan's gorgeous FJ40 nearly every day, and really, really enjoyed it . . . especially the expedition feel, and yes, the coolness and attention I got (I loved all the thumbs-ups and the 'dude' signs I got!).
The Zukes are very neat - tons and tons of cool accessories, with little ARBs (dare I say 'darling?') and racks and lockers, too. But safety and noise on the highway are a huge minus - they're pretty tinny. The Vitaras are better . . . but priced a little high for doing the swap to diesel, which would cost about $4K to do it right. Also, VW diesels have pretty low HP and torque (except the TDI, which are much harder to swap).
So what I'm finding is that the more modern these "small SUVs" have gotten, the heavier, the more powerful, and the more gas-guzzling they have gotten (though more safe). They're not economical at all.
Where to go next?
Any input anyone?
What am I missing?
Frankly I'm leaning back to what got me started on this to begin with: Find a nice FJ60 with a blown engine and replace it with a Toyota diesel . . . or import an Aussie diesel Land Cruiser for $10,000 or so . . . and then I should meet most of my criteria . . . that's the next phase of research now!