TerraLiner:12 m Globally Mobile Beach House/Class-A Crossover w 6x6 Hybrid Drivetrain

dwh

Tail-End Charlie
Field controlled - AC-motors can have FULL TORQUE off standstill.....

Yes, but won't *need* full torque at cruising speed. So you size the motor to get the truck moving and up to cruising speed, and use a gear reduction for low-crawling. That way you can use a smaller motor, optimized in size for "high range", which is what the truck will be doing 90% of the time, and gear reduction for "low range".


you will have to contol the start-up torque or you get a pain in the neck quickly....

Ah. Perfect place for a torque converter.


IF you have to re-gen to one motor your only ABS control is via brakes (friction brakes) and not via individual motor control - also re-gen through a trans (at the power levels you see at the Terraliner) will be rough....same as a "electronic" locker that uses ABS and brakes to "lock" the wheel - extremely rough...

Not at all. *Where* you bleed off the momentum doesn't matter - at the wheel, at the axle, or between the motor and transaxle. Doing it ahead of the transaxle is the same as using an engine brake on a diesel - let off the "go pedal" and braking action starts. Because it's electric, you need to manage your use of the pedal because it doesn't really "coast". If more braking is needed, then you push the "stop pedal", which can be setup either for just the mechanical brakes, or can be a complicated management system which maximizes the regen before engaging the mechanicals.

One way to do it, which is an idea I sort of like, is to have the former clutch pedal control the regen, and the regular brake pedal control the mechanicals - though it could also be vice versa. Then, on a long downhill, I could ride the regen pedal if need be, without having to engage the mechanicals. On a Tatra chassis, the mechanicals would of course be the standard air brakes/friction drums.

And of course, the regen would be engaged all the time, like a diesel engine brake - the extra pedal is just there to increase the amount of regen if needed.



braking alone is probably fine - until you need to control this on rough terrain...

You mean "regen braking alone"? No, it's probably not fine. You drive a truck right? I have a Class A commercial license (with HazMat) and you know as well as I do that there are a lot of dorks out there who think nothing of cutting off a 40t truck. THEY seem to have a lot of faith in the brakes on the big truck to save them from their own stupidity. They have more faith in the truck's brakes than *I* do.

So no, regen is not enough. I want bloody big friction brakes that I can jump on when needed.



Remember this is not a electric or hydraulic AUXILIARY brake - this is supposed to take over 98% of all braking action.....

I think that's way over-estimating. 98% *may* be achievable when cruising, but not in traffic, twisty mountain roads or when low-crawling.

Also, getting back to the bleeding off of momentum. If the truck is designed to run an engine/generator big enough to drive the truck without batteries, then the battery bank becomes minimized, and that reduces the storage space available for the bled off energy. This gets us back to having to provide a dump load.

So really, using a big engine/generator to electric motors at some point becomes pointless. You might as well just use a regular ol' diesel drive train and forget electric. I mean really - that Bosch system only achieves a SIX PERCENT efficiency increase? Yea, okay it's probably worth it for a fleet operator, but for a motorhome? Meh, not enough savings to bother, and while it might amortize on a fleet vehicle, it'll never pay for itself on a motorhome. (Though, using that generator/regen unit to add regen braking and battery charging to a normal truck might be a really nice feature for a motorhome.)

For hybrid, I think the key is making it essentially a battery powered vehicle, with on-board recharging ability. Then the battery bank has to be bigger, which is good for regen braking energy storage - and the engine/generator can be smaller, which is good for fuel consumption.

The key of course, is balancing the energy management properly - AND - running the generator to recharge batteries both when when the truck is being driven, AND when the truck is parked.


....and you lose a lot of energy through the trans/transfer. [This also holds true for the BOSCH-parallel hybrid....]

Some. Define "a lot". It's a bit like designing solar systems - one can get hung up worrying about a percent here or a percent there of efficiency losses, which in the big picture don't much matter anyway.


A e-motor optimizing reduction drive doesn't need any shifting implements and is optimized to the motor-size/target rpm.

What I proposed doesn't need any shifting implements either, unless you want to go into low range for crawling. Since it has that, might as well put the reverse there as well and not have to bother wiring up the motor (and regen system) for reverse.


Maybe then you should stay away from anything that has a motor or "engine" anyway ......:sombrero:

I probably should. I might put an eye out. :)

But seriously, if the Liner requires that the driver go through pilot training and become an active part of the energy management system, then they might not sell very many.
 

thjakits

Adventurer
Hey dwh,

1st let me state: I am NOT a e-drive specialist!! I DID know about different kinds of motors and generators and how they can be controlled - but that is a a few days going through Google and wikipedia and specialist websites - ...don't want to bother with that at this time. What I "know" about hybrid tech is mostly what I stumble upon when reading up articles about it!
THAT is also why I might change my mind about hub-motors. (If you want to bother....)....go back a load of pages and see me "fight" hub-motors.
Then hub-motors were huge, super-heavy, slow-running (direct drive) pancake units that are basically inside the wheel (rim/tire). Then I stumbled over the article of the Swiss/Dutch team with their e-racers - 37KW "fast runner" with planetary reduction, super-LIGHT weight .....now hub-motors don't look so bad anymore to me!! The wet-argument is not an argument for me - nothing easier than waterproofing a e-motor. Vibration and impact shocks are the only thing that tries to keep me off hub-motors, though I argued that one already too.

I DID drive trucks (40-tons to 84 tons) throughout Europe crossing the Alps about 1-2 times per week. That was for about 4 years on-off between 1989 and 1994. I "caught" the mandatory "enforced" speed-limiter (the sucker actually pushes the accel-pedal OUT when you approach the adjusted speed limit - 85km/h adjusted, legal 80km/h. Speeding was only possible downhill, when it was steep enough...) which required a change of technique when approaching a hill....(Luckily I missed the change from tacho-disks to blackboxes....)


Yes, but won't *need* full torque at cruising speed. So you size the motor to get the truck moving and up to cruising speed, and use a gear reduction for low-crawling. That way you can use a smaller motor, optimized in size for "high range", which is what the truck will be doing 90% of the time, and gear reduction for "low range".

Ideally the ONLY gear/trans involved should be a reduction-gear directly on the motor and or on the differential, IF you go with central motors.
I am pretty sure you that motors exist, that dish out "axle-snapping" torque at super-slow rpm and on the other hand can run high enough to bust high speed limits. If you have a good motor with field-control you can actually use it (in generator mode) to get to a stand-still!!
Even in super-slow and difficult terrain.
[Today's hybrids are not much off re-generators. If you are little ingenious/inventive you actually can cajole the CU into applying a lot more braking action to the re-gen system than they do from the factory - sample somewhere on http://origin.autospeed.com/....]


Ah. Perfect place for a torque converter.

IF I am not wrong the MAN/KAT torque converter is a hydraulic unit. So every time you need it, you convert a load of energy into heat.
WHY would you want that if you can just control via the e-motors?



Not at all. *Where* you bleed off the momentum doesn't matter - at the wheel, at the axle, or between the motor and transaxle. Doing it ahead of the transaxle is the same as using an engine brake on a diesel - let off the "go pedal" and braking action starts. Because it's electric, you need to manage your use of the pedal because it doesn't really "coast". If more braking is needed, then you push the "stop pedal", which can be setup either for just the mechanical brakes, or can be a complicated management system which maximizes the regen before engaging the mechanicals.

Okay - I think people are still stuck with comparing the hybrid re-gen thing with the older auxiliary braking systems - Jake-brake (I never encountered one in Europe, but would like to shoot every trucker using it in Panama!! Everyone here thinks taking out the muffler makes it work better.....and they certainly use it to a near standstill.....), Electric/magnetic brake (TELMA and others, manual says you must not use them for the 6 min before a intended stop - or might burn! Bad news if you HAVE to stop earlier!! The things go glowing yellow-hot when braking - field controlled!!) or my favorite the Voith-Schneider Hydraulic Retarder (ALWAYS works - no max time limit, just keep the engine-rpm up so the cooling water keeps circulating!! ....also excellent to warm up the engine on a cold day, if you cannot get to drive under power quickly....), EXHAUST-brake (a "throttle" in the exhaust to choke the engine, at the time I was driving they were rather lousy - proper means of control was just about to come on the market to be able to completely choke without destroying the turbos....)

ALL of these systems are AUXILIARY systems!! ON a fairly fast and steep pass down hill it STILL required application of the friction brakes quite often (mostly braking into turns).....
However, it was possible to brake and let the brakes cool off again - with the AUX holding enough in the meanwhile....

Now - IF we go full serial hybrid, I would expect the re-gen braking go effectively to a near-standstill.
I would expect the electric part of the braking system to even HOLD in tough terrain (and only apply friction brakes after a certain time limit, e.g 4-5 sec. if the vehicle is not put in motion in the meantime - no doubt, holding under e-control WILL use up energy!!).

Also - I certainly would NOT use 2 brake pedals!! Way too confusing! IF you must have 2 separate brakes (which I do not advocate....), then keep the regular brake and use the e-brake with a lever on the steering column, like established for most aux-brakes.
[Exhaust brakes would have a floor-switch for the RIGHT foot (eliminating the chance to engage accel and brake at the same time - ....wouldn't be too nice for the engine! I understand the Jake had a separate control lever/buttons too....., but no pedals)

HOWEVER - I would push for a "transparent" single brake-pedal arrangement! In a "sophisticated" machine like the Terraliner you should not even feel WHAT brake is braking!! The friction brake should only be necessary as a parking brake (or the sample I mentioned above...) and be automatically applied slightly once every 3 days of driving to clean of rust!! It should be possible to reduce friction brake weight to less than 1/2 of present day usual truck brakes....
[OBVIOUSLY - they still need to be able to stop the whole truck and trailer on the steepest/fastest down hill run you possibly can find yourself in - at least once to a complete stop!! Just as a safety-anchor.... So, the brakes will still be of a good size!!
At the end, YES you WILL have to get a Terraliner license (or at least a thorough check-out, ESPECIALLY if you have zero "HEAVY"-experience!!) to be able to operate it safely...No matter if direct diesel drive or parallel or serial hybrid, you STILL have to be aware of how mass/inertia/braking limits need to work together!

[I saw plenty of burning or at least wasted brakes on the bottom of the Austrian side of the Brenner-Paß, where it joins the Inntal-Autobahn towards Germany. Mostly Dutch trucks with very young drivers! Mostly on their 1st solo Italy-run. They mostly passed everyone smartly on some of the straight downhill stretches, probably wondering why everyone was "semi-crawling" downhill!! A fast run would only be possible if you had an empty stretch back from the south. As soon as there is some cargo on the truck - you HAVE to make do with any and all brakes, BUT the friction ones!
One could smell them 10 min before seeing them!! Burned brakes have very distinct smell! .....am I right, OptimusPrime ?]

ON the Terraliner I would expect to also have a transparent accelerator - reaction just like with a "gas pedal" as we are used too!
[Never mind, that nowadays you are NOT stepping on the gas but on a potentiometer....]
Obviously, "coasting" would be electronically controlled. You even could get a custom "feel" built into the control-system!!

and YES you CAN coast on e-drive, involves shorting certain circuits and you become a "roller"....
[If that is practical for hybrid e-drive - I would not know...]

Brakes - same as Accel - you will "brake" on a poti too - when the friction brakes have to come in a electric air-valve will apply these instead of a mechanical air-valve (...now considering that the Terrraliner will be a ELECTRIC vehicle, one might want to analyze if a air-brake still holds enough advantage over a hydraulic one.... IF Air-SUSPENSION is chosen, air-BRAKES is a no-brainer.....).
WHICH brake is needed would be decided by the control unit! I just would want a visual indication when the friction brakes are on (yellow LED or so....) - I would expect to see that one only after a full stop, when the brakes engage as a parking brake or holding brake in terrain - yellow flashing when they are used when the vehicle is still in motion, THAT's when they get hot.


You mean "regen braking alone" ? 1]
No, it's probably not fine. You drive a truck right? 2]
I have a Class A commercial license (with HazMat) and you know as well as I do that there are a lot of dorks out there who think nothing of cutting off a 40t truck. THEY seem to have a lot of faith in the brakes on the big truck to save them from their own stupidity. They have more faith in the truck's brakes than *I* do.

So no, regen is not enough. I want bloody big friction brakes that I can jump on when needed.

1] Yes I do....
.....see above

2] Not anymore, but I did - up to some interesting weights! [I started to do some interesting drifting, going on a juust wet - still slimy from all the dirt and not washed off from the rain yet - Autobahn through the rolling hills part from Munich to Salzburg, with a Heavy Loader - 500hp DAF tractor with heavy Tandem-drive axle and 5-axle Goldhofer-trailer (MGVW-95 tons). Rig was empty, brakes are super-sensitive as they are super-heavy-duty, but when the rig is empty they bite hard even if you juuuust touch the pedal. The rig had an empty-weight of 22+ tons!! Anyway, I just went over a hill top and back off the accelerator to not pass 90 km/h - tacho-disks!! ....engine was braking so good just by itself, that it actually slowed the tandem axles BELOW speed!! Next thing I have the trailer jack-knifing and drifting on the middle-lane, when I am on the right one!! A little trailer-"stretcher"-action and a small bit of accelerator brought it in nice and smoothly....never forget that one!! - ....which brings me to...]

....another recommendation, BIO: IF you provide a trailer-coupling, provide a "trailer-stretcher" too. I believe they are outlawed since a long time (trailer short haulers would cause accidents down the road by not braking properly, but abuse the stretcher to save their brakes on the truck but waste the ones on the trailer....), except for Heavy Load Special rigs.
Terraliner would qualify as a Special Rig. IF you wanted to tow a trailer with Terraliner you need to get a proper license anyway and a Owner of a Terraliner would not be prone to abuse his own trailer!!
However this item could save your day - if you ever get caught drifting around on a icy road in NE-Siberia! ....or just a regular cold winter ANYWHERE!

dwh - a properly configured electric brake (generator) would actually be a lot more trustworthy than any friction brake out there! And you can even make them with auto-field generation (kind of like the air-brake actuators on Truck rear-axles - if you loose brake-air, a set of springs will apply the brakes and stop you - ....and KEEP you locked stopped until you supply air again - fix that line or when getting towed, release them by compressing the spring with a bolt, that you screw in!) - in any case you have the friction brakes as a back up.....

I think, regarding driveline, brakes, driving we need to get a completely new set of impressions/ideas if we think Terraliner/Serial hybrid - Past Engine-direct drive experience will not apply to the extend we sometimes imagine right now....



....you know as well as I do that there are a lot of dorks out there who think nothing of cutting off a 40t truck.

Certainly do!! And didn't think of much cutting out in front of them dorks either, IF they were the kind that would come flying along at 240km/h flashing lights from 3 km behind, approaching a hill!! I figured if their high-beam flasher works that great, surely their brakes must too!!
I am not that provocative anymore today - besides most climbs are restricted nowadays - no more passing of trucks by trucks! But back then I would not trade a 5-10 min climb for a 30-45min climb behind a overloaded/under-powered Romanian Truck doing 3-5 km/h were I would do 85-90km/h!!

So - late, but: Apologies to all the Porsche/BMW/Audi Autobahn-racers I had test their High-beam/brake coordination skills!!



I think that's way over-estimating. 98% *may* be achievable when cruising, but not in traffic, twisty mountain roads or when low-crawling.

You can control to 100% - ABSOLUTELY!! Question is, if this is possible efficiently! (I would say today with computer controlled Thyristor systems it should not be a problem at all - BIO, THIS IS where we all would like to get some feedback from your e-drive specialist engineering friends!! btw - I never got an answer from the BOSCH folks regarding their parallel system ....)



Also, getting back to the bleeding off of momentum. If the truck is designed to run an engine/generator big enough to drive the truck without batteries, then the battery bank becomes minimized, and that reduces the storage space available for the bled off energy. This gets us back to having to provide a dump load.

So really, using a big engine/generator to electric motors at some point becomes pointless. You might as well just use a regular ol' diesel drive train and forget electric. I mean really - that Bosch system only achieves a SIX PERCENT efficiency increase? Yea, okay it's probably worth it for a fleet operator, but for a motorhome? Meh, not enough savings to bother, and while it might amortize on a fleet vehicle, it'll never pay for itself on a motorhome. (Though, using that generator/regen unit to add regen braking and battery charging to a normal truck might be a really nice feature for a motorhome.)

For hybrid, I think the key is making it essentially a battery powered vehicle, with on-board recharging ability. Then the battery bank has to be bigger, which is good for regen braking energy storage - and the engine/generator can be smaller, which is good for fuel consumption.

The key of course, is balancing the energy management properly - AND - running the generator to recharge batteries both when when the truck is being driven, AND when the truck is parked.

And that is EXACTLY what we all are talking about for ages!! :ylsmoke:

Now - for a mobile-home/Explorer/Overlander, serial hybrid JUUUUST MIGHT make sense, depending how much you really want to move - ...and how long you plan to stay in places....[besides that a serial hybrid is a must for the design goals....].

I can see that at the present diesel-gen-e-drive efficiency levels and present and near-future battery tech, Serial hybrid is NOT ready for the longhaul truck.
A Longhauler cannot afford to waist a lot of cargo weight on batteries. That's why I believe the Bosch System is not going to make it all the way through the Brenner Paß without falling back on a hydraulic retarder or at least some EXCELLENT exhaust brake. Then their system is just a start-up into the heavy Weight-Hybrid world. They can run for 6 km on battery only, which is great in inner-city stop-and-go and to maneuver around on a ramp or power a electric A/C for the driver when waiting on load in South Italy or Spain!!

Oshkosh shows, that Military may have other priorities than Long Haulers - after all Military Trucks are mostly parked somewhere, most of their live!
Instead of having to load and truck in a Stationary Power-plant, why not make the truck the power plant and drive it electrically, when the plant is NOT in use otherwise? Brilliant - hopefully!

Now where we get at with a electric Motor-home/Explorer/Overlander is, that IF we already use electricity as our means of powertrain, it should only make sense to optimize the whole rig to use electricity for everything possible: Lights, heat, cooling, cooking, slide-outs, raising-roofs, EVERYTHING possible.
Which - at least for me - implies that I would carry a SERIOUS battery bank!! YES - it will cause a serious chunk of the empty weight, but it also will allow me to maximize hybrid efficiency to the max.
As I mentioned before - hopefully the bank size can be proportioned to the longest, fastest, heaviest, steepest possible downhill run ANYWHERE!!
[NO idea which run that would be - BUT I am sure SOMEONE on Expedition Portal WILL know!!]
.....this way you would not have any need to burn energy to heat the environment! (Hopefully this would be enough to keep me "householding" in the worst possibly conditions - energy wise - for at least 24-36 hrs]
[I also would always have/maintain serious load of water available to heat up...and use later....]

Obviously for a Longhauler a huge battery bank is a no-no. For a MH/E/OL it is kind of part of the deal/equipment, might as well use it.....



.... Define "a lot". It's a bit like designing solar systems - one can get hung up worrying about a percent here or a percent there of efficiency losses, which in the big picture don't much matter anyway.

Depending on the trans and power you push through it - 15-45% loss - going up in heat!



What I proposed doesn't need any shifting implements either, unless you want to go into low range for crawling. Since it has that, might as well put the reverse there as well and not have to bother wiring up the motor (and regen system) for reverse.

MY mistake! I thought you wanted to keep the WHOLE TATRA drivetrain incl. trans and transfer......

I think, unless Terralainer goes with heavy, slow-speed, pancake - "in wheel" - hub-drives, there is no way around "some" gears in the system...
[Again - that's where Bio's engineering friends need to consult their sliderulers.....]

Wiring up e-drive for backwards running is hardly an obstacle -even if you use AC.....IF I can save the Trans (and hopefully Transfer as well), I gladly would wire the e-drive for it!!
[I think you may have a wrong impression of transmission gear efficiency levels when the gears are under load. Now 45% is at the extreme end, just before the trans explodes, but 15-25% loss is the norm....1 or 2% difference doesn't really figure, loosing 25% loss DOES very much!! That is part of the efficiency hunt with the hybrid story, loose as much geared power-train as possible! THAT's where BIO need's to deal with the e-drive engineering buddies! What is more efficient? 6 smaller less efficient hub drives with their own little re-drives or 3 bigger, more efficient, direct drive motors going through a differential reduction and most likely a hub-reduction?]

.....and just to keep throwing it out there - I STILL do not yet discard the hydro-drive hub motors as a possible!
[Using 1 rear-drive axle as the main-drive unit and all other axles as aux-units, IF it should turn out that the MAIN-drive axle can harness enough re-gen, than you don't need the other axles for that - HOWEVER I do have my doubts about that. Breaking heavy shoots a LOT of Inertia forward - that means, there is a LOT of energy to be harvested on the forward axle(s). It is possible to harvest and store energy through the hydro-drive, they do it by storing some in cylinders with a gas-chamber - or spring loaded floating piston - to immediately harvest the energy again as soon as you need drive-power]



Maybe then you should stay away from anything that has a motor or "engine" anyway ......
I probably should. I might put an eye out.

But seriously, if the Liner requires that the driver go through pilot training and become an active part of the energy management system, then they might not sell very many.

dwh - you might find to learn your way around a sophisticated serial-hybrid way less challenging than your dual-brake pedal system!!
[I know F1 uses right accel - left brake, but that is not what most people will have in "their" system!
I think it would be way more challenging to read through the manual than the actual operation of the Terraliner-drive-system - actually I think that would be rather "boring simple"! - .....especially for those jocks that still know how to row a 16-speed....

IF you have a sophisticated ENERGY-CONTROL-SYSTEM, that takes topography into consideration, there is no choice than for you to plan ahead, if you want to max out efficiency.
However - you could even program the controller to consult the operator before reaching a decision point.

"Hello dwh!! It's me your AWESOME Terraliner! How are you today?" [Useless question, but might make you feel good! - switch off/on option when you configure initially!!] - [....after enough pause for you to be able to answer the previous useless question:] "Would you like to opt out of the downhill prep sequence?"
[...or alternately:] "Would you like to opt for the camp-on-top option?"

As we are talking "sophisticated" Terraliner we WILL have voice recognition and all you have to do is say: YES or NO [....maybe: "I am fine thanks!" first, IF you keep the make-feel-good option....]

And Terraliner will either keep the batteries where they are or get when reaching the pass or it will bleed down the batteries to have them empty for the down hill run (using the energy to still drive up the hill - of course you can program the default - keep the downhill sequence if there is no answer! Thisway you have all the break-energy storage available and should change your mind - you got a huge powerplant on board - just charge the batteries! ).

Most road-data is available for GPS today, so that should be little trouble to incorporate.
Anyway - I think if you are going Overlanding/Exploring you will HAVE to do some road-planning or WILL be in trouble shortly.....



BIO:

Mana: great artist, loved throughout S-America and beyond. LOADS of other Latin-speaking artists too....

Can't talk about Latino Music without mentioning Santana....


But learning to really love Latin culture -- which means loving countries like Italy, Spain, Portugal, and the Latin American countries -- that's another story.

I wouldn't know about Italy/Spain/Portugal - but Latin America is a entirely different story!
It may have become what it is today because of the European Latin countries, but has it's completely own identity today - it is very easy:

Not counting vacation....

You come to this part of the world (work or other obligations) and settle in - if after 6 weeks you can't take it, you never will. If you get the hang of Latino America you are probably useless for the rest of the world for the rest of your life!! :sombrero::sombrero::sombrero:

Also - there are huge differences between countries - Mexicans are not Latinos - they are MEXICANS!!
Chileans are not Latino either they are more GERMAN than Germany!! And Argentinians can't believe how many roads and streets in ITALY have "Argentinian" names!!

Cuban's are Caribbeans, but are actually are way more Latino than Chileans and Argentinians together!!


There is slight affiliation when they meet outside Latino America, just like Europeans start to stick together, but as soon as they are on home-turf again old rivalries are right back!

[...except for the French, ...these are ALWAYS french!!]



'nough for today!

thjakits:coffee:
 

egn

Adventurer
@thjakits:
Then I stumbled over the article of the Swiss/Dutch team with their e-racers - 37KW "fast runner" with planetary reduction, super-LIGHT weight .....now hub-motors don't look so bad anymore to me!!

What do you want to achieve with such toy motors? :)

They are designed to work for a few races and not to last for 100th thousand of miles with long service interval.

The power of 6x37 kW = 222 kW = 302 hp would be at the low end, but the resulting torque at the wheels of 6x 1630Nm = 9,780 Nm is extremely bad for the Terraliner with a weight of 18 t (metric). :rolleyes:

Even my old MAN KAT has a maximum torque at the wheels of about 984 Nm * 2.5 * 6.37 * 1.07 * 6.734 * 1.59 = 179,526 Nm. This means that it has a pulling power from standstill of about 18 t (metric) without burning a clutch, and even that is not enough in some situations.

Regarding necessary power when I do the calculation for my truck I come to the result that I need about 300 kW to do a 3 % incline with constant speed of 80 km/h, which is pretty much that what I get currently. For a 6 % incline and same speed I would already need about 430 kW. On flat surface I need about 170 kW power at a speed of 80 km/h.

Of course Terraliner shouldn't be like a brick as our KAT. For my calculation I took a drag coefficient of 0.6 and a frontal car area of 10 sqm. A drag coefficient of 0.4 would reduce the power on flat surface for 80 km/h to about 154 kW. Bringing down the weight to 12 t would reduce the power to 113 kW.

Shouldn't such a future concept try to save weight as much as possible?

This will also allow to reduce weight on a lot of points of the chassis construction and makes the vehicle more off-road capable.

For a serial hybrid the continuous power of the generator should output at least 1.5 times the continuous power for maintaining highway speed to be able to recharge the battery. As I wrote earlier two of the Jenoptik units would be ok to get enough power. Because of a large battery bank with at least 100 kWh I see no need for an extra generator just for supplying house power. This all is additional weight and room.

In my opinion a gear box with at least 2 gears for the electric motors makes sense, because there is either to low torque at the wheels or the rpm of the electric motor is more than 10,000. It is right that synchronous electric motors deliver torque from standstill and can do high rpm, but the best efficiency is normally in a range of 2000 - 6000 rpm.

For me the biggest question is, whether Terraliner with 10 m length, 18 t weight and loaded with so many features is the way to go. At the moment I don't see how all this features can be packed into the available 10 * 2.5 * 4 = 100 cbm room without making compromises on living and storage room. Especially the last is missing on a lot of expedition vehicles. The vehicles are fully loaded with technical features, but there are only small lockers available for personal cloths and other items. In reality there is even less room available because most of the lowest 0.5 - 1 m is lost to wheels and chassis.

Design and feature list is one point, but converting this to a real construction is a very complicated task, which cannot always be completed. I am sure some features will have to be dropped. Better make a clear priority list first in order not to get lost in the details.
 

optimusprime

Proffessional daydreamer.
Thjakits .... Oh yes, overheated brakes,once smelt,never forgotten,very very distinctive smell.

I should imagine that trying to get the Terraliner type approved for sale in Europe would be near impossible without friction brakes on each wheel.
Exhaust brakes nowadays are very good, but that won't apply to Terraliner as there isn't a direct link between engine and wheels, so thats out.
friction brakes with assist,yep fine,but do not rely on 'non friction' braking as your primary source of stopping power.
 

thjakits

Adventurer
Hey Optimus!!

We CERTAINLY want friction brakes on all wheels - however, I think they can be a LOT smaller/lighter than normal - still - they should be able to stop the rig at least once completely from the worst case scenario....

thjakits
 
Last edited:

thjakits

Adventurer
Hi ENG,

What do you want to achieve with such toy motors?

They are designed to work for a few races and not to last for 100th thousand of miles with long service interval.


As posted before - I think I read somewhere about these guys, that they have a 70KW version running
THEN, these are prototypes, can't buy them - University study/development

6x70KW should do the trick!

And once the design is done - you cna go for long term durability!

I just liked the appearance of different kind of hub-motor (vs. the usual heavy, slow-runner in-wheel units)

As the Terraliner is just such a program (at this time) - I suggested that BIO gets in contact wit these guys....
Torque at the whell is just a matter of reduction....

By any means - I just don't want Bio to throw out the Hub-motors quite yet - but I think the best solution will be 3 central motors, reduced them via the Solid Axle Differentials and if needed via the hubs again....



Also agree on that Bio is off on a Fantasy Trip at the moment too!! Trying to fit too much fancy stuff into limited space!
All this "wide-open view" thing, lifting 2nd floor etc... is all nice and fancy but in my opinion by-passing the Explorer/Overlander needs/wants.

I believe, most would rather want a fold-down porch, flip-up cover (could be full of solar-cells) over the porch, as many slide outs as possible and IF you must have something "pop-up" and "open air" - fabric unit over the master-bedroom (if there are more...) for nice weather-oportunities.....

But - let some time pass and Bio will come down to reality again - eventually!!


Cheers all,

thjakits:coffee:
 
Last edited:

egn

Adventurer
As the Terraliner is just such a program (at this time) - I suggested that BIO gets in contact wit these guys....
Torque at the whell is just a matter of reduction....

In principle yes, but with no gearbox you are limited by the max rpm regarding speed.

For hub motors with very high torque and a large range of wheel rpm you have to go a step further and implement multiple gears with the planetary transmission, just like an automatic transmission works. Depending what part of the planetary transmission is connected to the wheel you get multiple gears. So effectively you have to put a simple automatic transmission in every hub motor.

Even the BMW i8 has a 2-gear transmission for the electric motor to get good acceleration with high torque combined with high speed with combined power.
 
Last edited:

Pinstripe

Adventurer
Here's another fully integrated unit, with slideouts - though not for off road - built on a Peterbuilt truck, the 'Verschueren'.

peterbilt_verschueren_1.jpg

peterbilt_verschueren_3.jpg

peterbilt_verschueren_2.jpg

verschueren_07.JPG


Spanish article: http://rastreadordenoticias.com/2014/11/verschueren-peterbilt-379/

360 degree: http://www.camping-car.com/360/camping-car-poids-lourd-verschueren.html
 

thjakits

Adventurer
Pinstripe!

Nice find!!

Mixing "Classic" with "state of the art!"

Also makes good point for my Slide-out and against 2 story opinion....

thjakits
 

biotect

Designer
...
Hi Pinstripe,

Really great lead with that Peterbilt!!


***********************************************


1. Verschueren Horseboxes


***********************************************



I looked up the vehicle’s builder, Verschueren, and came across this good video (also see http://www.youwebtube.com/videos/un-camion-peterbilt-amenage-en-camping-car.html ):


[video=dailymotion;x2c2usi]http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2c2usi_un-camion-peterbilt-amenage-en-camping-car_auto?start=4[/video]


And here are some more weblinks: https://www.facebook.com/lemondeducampingcar/posts/829772853742094 , https://www.facebook.com/campingcarmag/posts/699755716777847 , http://www.camping-car.com/contenu/actualites/peterbilt-verschueren-bien-plus-quun-beau-camion , http://www.lemondeducampingcar.fr/a...ng-car-sur-la-base-d-un-camion-peterbilt.html . But the Spanish article that you referenced still seems to have the most complete set of images, at http://rastreadordenoticias.com/2014/11/verschueren-peterbilt-379/ .

Most of the weblinks are in French, because it turns out that although Verschueren sounds like a Dutch or German name, the company is Belgian. It is located right on the border between the Dutch-speaking and French-speaking parts of Belgium, so it probably thinks of itself as a French/Dutch company – see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communities,_regions_and_language_areas_of_Belgium , https://www.google.com/maps/place/N...s0x47c318511d18ff45:0x10da095be4d7d ace?hl=nl , http://www.rjr-verschueren.be/contact8.html . Although the Verschueren webpages display different flags and seem to promise that versions of the website are also available in English and German, as near as I can tell, only the French and Dutch flags actually work – see http://www.rjr-verschueren.be/index.html .

Now it turns out that Verschueren’s specialty is Horseboxes – see the gallery pages at http://www.rjr-verschueren.be/Gallerij1/Gallerij1/album/indexgallerij1.html , http://www.rjr-verschueren.be/indexgallerij2.html , http://www.rjr-verschueren.be/transportmiddelen8.html , and http://www.rjr-verschueren.be/onderdelen en toebehoren8.html .

And on the Verschueren website there are some good, honest images of what COE actually means for a motorhome that otherwise seems to be fully integrated, at http://www.rjr-verschueren.be/onderhoud en herstel6.html :


Weder_23.jpg Lastwagen_Karin_012.jpg



Whereas in the Peterbilt truck that you just posted, Pinstripe, there would be no such problem, because it’s CBE.

Parenthetical remark: don’t worry, egn, I am no longer interested in CBE, now that the generator-on-a-slide-out tray is a good solution, for a serial hybrid vehicle. If the diesel generator (or generators, plural) just pull out the front of the vehicle, as suggested by dwh, then there is no longer any reason for the cab to lift, and no undermining of full integration:


Gen7 copy.jpg


A slide-out tray like this would give full 360 degree access to the diesel generator(s), for servicing and repairs. So a fully “COE” design becomes possible, and yet also fully integrated, with no tilting cab.

With that said, perhaps also like you Pinstripe, I am a big fan of CBE trucks that have plenty of anthropomorphic “personality” – see post #126 at http://www.expeditionportal.com/for...pedition-RV-w-Rigid-Torsion-Free-Frame/page13 . Continental Europeans tend to feel differently, and many consider big American semi-rigs with huge bonnets to be ugly. Interesting, then, that this truck is a Belgian build.

But aesthetics aside, COE really is preferable in an expedition motorhome. The problem is that in a CBE design, the length occupied by the bonnet becomes “wasted length”, length that could otherwise be occupied by cab-area seats in a COE format.


***********************************************

CONTINUED IN NEXT POST

.
 
Last edited:

biotect

Designer
.
CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS POST

***********************************************



2. Ketterer Horseboxes


***********************************************


I am a real fan of Horseboxes, because even though they are often very big trucks, the fact that they have to devote half their space to carrying horses, means that the are forced to come up with creative solutions for the part of the motorhome occupied by humans. They are forced to try to “integrate” the cab area with the rest of the motorhome as much as possible. Some Horseboxes are designed to carry as many as 6 horses + 6 humans.

I have already posted some images of how Ketterer tries to accomplish this – see post #110 at http://www.expeditionportal.com/for...pedition-RV-w-Rigid-Torsion-Free-Frame/page11 . Ketterer is/was considered Germany's premium builder of Horseboxes, but its website no longer seems to be working, so I wonder if it has gone under? See http://www.ketterer-trucks.de . Glad that I downloaded most of the website when it was still working!

Here are the images of some Ketterer interiors that I posted earlier, plus some more that I have not yet posted; images that, it seems, are no longer available online…..:(



39c3ba0a8c.jpg 7219da0d23.jpg 979353d0e2.jpg
cbac8bc37a.jpg b7fb78447f-1.jpg f1cf4d7970.jpg
995998390c-1.jpg 9f2140cf45.jpg 5862155b8b.jpg
0d30de8178.jpg



***********************************************

CONTINUED IN NEXT POST

.
 
Last edited:

biotect

Designer
.
CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS POST

***********************************************



7576961754.jpg 4b80c1c437.jpg 2725661998.jpg
c77f2b6ba4.jpg 2ddd495095.jpg



In all of these images the seats immediately adjacent the living area swivel around fully to become part of the living area. And their backs fold down completely, to allow a pull-down bed ample room. So none of the cab area space is wasted.


***********************************************


CONTINUED IN NEXT POST

.
 
Last edited:

biotect

Designer
.
CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS POST

***********************************************



3. British Horseboxes


***********************************************


Now even though Britain does not seem to have much of a general-market motorhome industry – or at least not compared to Germany – Britain has many specialized makers of “luxury” Horseboxes. See for instance Oakley, Empire, Quigly, Lehel/Alexander, Sovereign, Prestige, and Equicruiser: http://www.oakleyhorseboxes.co.uk/default.asp , http://www.oakleyhorseboxes.co.uk/supremacy.asp , and http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...pss-500-000-horse-box-thats-fit-princess.html ; http://empirecoachbuilders.com , http://empirecoachbuilders.com/empire-range/ultimate/ , and http://empirecoachbuilders.com/gallery/ ; http://www.quigleyhorseboxes.com and http://www.quigleyhorseboxes.com/horsebox-image-gallery/2005-5-horse-for-sale ; http://www.lehelhorseboxes.co.uk , http://www.lehelhorseboxes.co.uk/index.php/26t , http://www.lehelhorseboxes.co.uk/index.php/heritage , and http://alexandersgroup.tv ; http://www.sovereignhorseboxes.com , http://www.sovereignhorseboxes.com/index.php/sovereign-range , and http://www.sovereignhorseboxes.com/index.php/gallery ; http://www.prestigehorsebox.com , http://www.prestigehorsebox.com/newsite/ , http://www.prestigehorsebox.com/newsite/horse-boxes/ , http://www.prestigehorsebox.com/newsite/gallery/ , and https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCofsJfWwUBmHWS26oIlZmSg ; http://www.equicruiser.co.uk/home.htm , http://www.equicruiser.co.uk/bespoke-design.htm , and http://www.equicruiser.co.uk/living-area.htm ; and https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKgFduuE0UfvV2IUqsPjiDtx_2XcM-O_b :





For a good survey article of many luxury British brands, see http://www.horseandhound.co.uk/features/luxury-horseboxes/ .

Even though all of these Horseboxes are based on COE trucks, their exteriors as well as interiors strive to look integrated, as per Ketterer. They can't afford to waste space, and just like more mainstream motorhomes, they need the seats in the cab, or the space above the cab, to do double-duty serving the motorhome interior as well:


26t_spec1.jpg Untitled-2.jpg Untitled-1.jpg
Stamp Rug.jpg Untitled-2.jpg Untitled-1.jpg
photo copy.jpg dsc_5671.jpg 18i_1_20140725_1092890838.jpg
Untitled-3.jpg



***********************************************

CONTINUED IN NEXT POST

.
 
Last edited:

biotect

Designer
.
CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS POST

***********************************************



platinum1.jpg soverign0038 10-13-41.jpg int14T.jpg
tapner2.jpg mercint.jpg 0d4b5b7545b42c4d20be5489a25323c7.jpg
article-2181966-14513DBA000005DC-374_634x464.jpg



Clearly, none of these British Horsebox interiors are quite as “integrated” as the Ketterer interiors just shown. One reason seems to be that they do not align the floor level of the cab with the floor level of the camper. So aside from the first few examples, the cab seats don't swivel around. But because the floor level of the cab is lower, they can create a space for a bed above that is permanent, and not pull-down, as per the Ketterers.

This may seem like just a matter of taste: trading one compromise for another. But it's also probably a matter of money: the Ketterer way of doing things is probably more expensive. And it's worth observing that mainstream German Liner motorhomes and American Class A motorhomes will do things the way that Ketterer does.

Furthermore, for me personally the British Horsesboxes are not nearly as aesthetically pleasing and well-designed as the Ketterers. In the following two images, I don't like most of the interior, but I do like the idea of Art Deco patterned marquetry inlay on the floor:


ha160212_ag01_-70.jpg ha160212_ag01_-78.jpg


Not for the first floor of the TerraLiner, mind you, but rather, for the second floor where the bedroom and living room will be.....:sombrero:

So Pinstripe, if you come across any other continental-Europe based manufacturers of Horseboxes, please post the weblinks and/or images. Horseboxes are extremely relevant to this thread, again, because they have to strive for integration and the most efficient use of space.

Verschueren is certainly interesting, but looking through its gallery of images, Verschueren Horseboxes do not seem to be very well-appointed; not even as nice as the British Horseboxes just illustrated. Let alone as aesthetically pleasing as the Ketterer interiors. So I didn't post any Verschueren images. But if you come across any “Luxury” Horsebox manufacturers that are continental European, again, please post.

All best wishes,



Biotect
 
Last edited:

biotect

Designer
dwh and thjakits,

Great debate, and just wanted to let both of you know that it was a very interesting read for someone like me, who has comparatively little engineering or technical background. The debate stayed civil, and was conducted using reason, evidence, argument, etc. This is exactly what is needed in a thread like this. The debate may have stressed out both of you (??), but if I can speak for the rest of us, it was very informative, and made us think. I will try to respond to what is now (for me) a backlog of about 6 pages of material, later in the week.

All best wishes,


Biotect
 
Last edited:

Forum statistics

Threads
188,382
Messages
2,903,946
Members
230,272
Latest member
RodneyKnighten
Top