The Ursa Minor Modern Shell/RTT Concept Thread

Are you interested in a new take on a classic design?


  • Total voters
    56
  • Poll closed .

matt s

Explorer
This was one of my biggest issues with my high rise topper. The inward sloping walls greatly reduced the interior space and made it impossible to lean against them. For a useable camper space, IMO, vertical walls are a must.

I'm the other way. I would way rather have one that fits the lines of the vehicle and is similar in shape to the fiberglass truck toppers. The wildernest did that well.

I would also vote for front or side flip. Flip off the rear presents issues including head room behind the vehicle when deployed. I wouldn't want to have to remember to duck every time i went around the back for something.
 

4RunAmok

Explorer
Personally, I would like to see an E-Camper in a "bolts on anything" style, like a Maggiolina. But lighter than a Maggiolina, with a much lower profile.

I can't see why Ursa Minor limits their business to Jeeps and Elements.
 

Dave Bennett

Adventurist
Well, the Jeep market is a no brainer but since the Element is out of production this creates opportunities for innovation elsewhere. And frees up resources I hope.
 

Frostymug

Observer
FlipPac Shell

For all the FlipPac faults the utilitarian shape is not one of them. As stated elsewhere in this thread the boxy profile allows for maximum space efficiency and the relatively vertical walls are advantageous to cargo storage and interior customization. Trying to make the camper look like a typical fiberglass shell with a profile that follows the cab roofline would give up too much space. I also see problems with a sleeping area that would be too narrow to adequately accommodate two adults. While a design that improves aerodynamics would be welcome I would not want to give up much if any interior volume as a result. Again as has been said elsewhere: “Form follows Function”

While I can see the attractions to a roof that opens to the rear, I think it may cause more issues than benefits. There is a lot to be said for the compact footprint and ease of set up that the current front opening FlipPac provides. With a rear opening design it may not be possible to tie the roof support poles directly to the vehicle. Having to secure support poles to the ground adds complexity. Think uneven sloping rocky ground and high winds.

Another issue, assuming a six foot (or less) truck bed length, is the length of the sleeping area, either the front would have to extend over the cab or the rear would have to extend past the rear bumper (like the Wildernest) in order to have a long enough sleeping area. Additionally, getting in and out of the sleeping area would be more difficult because of the tailgate area.

Barn doors would be nice but again I think this would add too much complexity and cost.

I'm not trying to put a damper on anyone's ideas, just playing devil's advocate. I think Tacodoc started a needed discussion and we should use it to brainstorm ideas.

Some improvements I'd like to see in a new design:

- Eliminate the torsion bar. Maybe replace it with some type of gear system?
- Relocate the lid latches to the inside and use alignment pins. The present external locations limit awning-mounting options. Internal latches would also provide better security.
- Make the shell sidewalls completely flat so windows or solid access panels can be easily added.
- Source high quality windows.
- Reinforce the shell / provide built-in mounting locations for easy installation of awnings and roof racks.

Cliff
 

trump

Adventurist
For all the FlipPac faults the utilitarian shape is not one of them. As stated elsewhere in this thread the boxy profile allows for maximum space efficiency and the relatively vertical walls are advantageous to cargo storage and interior customization. Trying to make the camper look like a typical fiberglass shell with a profile that follows the cab roofline would give up too much space. I also see problems with a sleeping area that would be too narrow to adequately accommodate two adults. While a design that improves aerodynamics would be welcome I would not want to give up much if any interior volume as a result. Again as has been said elsewhere: “Form follows Function”

While I can see the attractions to a roof that opens to the rear, I think it may cause more issues than benefits. There is a lot to be said for the compact footprint and ease of set up that the current front opening FlipPac provides. With a rear opening design it may not be possible to tie the roof support poles directly to the vehicle. Having to secure support poles to the ground adds complexity. Think uneven sloping rocky ground and high winds.

Another issue, assuming a six foot (or less) truck bed length, is the length of the sleeping area, either the front would have to extend over the cab or the rear would have to extend past the rear bumper (like the Wildernest) in order to have a long enough sleeping area. Additionally, getting in and out of the sleeping area would be more difficult because of the tailgate area.

Barn doors would be nice but again I think this would add too much complexity and cost.

I'm not trying to put a damper on anyone's ideas, just playing devil's advocate. I think Tacodoc started a needed discussion and we should use it to brainstorm ideas.

Some improvements I'd like to see in a new design:

- Eliminate the torsion bar. Maybe replace it with some type of gear system?
- Relocate the lid latches to the inside and use alignment pins. The present external locations limit awning-mounting options. Internal latches would also provide better security.
- Make the shell sidewalls completely flat so windows or solid access panels can be easily added.
- Source high quality windows.
- Reinforce the shell / provide built-in mounting locations for easy installation of awnings and roof racks.

Cliff

Well put. You said much of what I didn't have time to type yesterday.
 

njtacoma

Explorer
For me it is the tent. I would like to see a better tent, I believe there is a thread addressing the same thing. Better fabric, and water resistance would be great.
 
A

agavelvr

Guest
For all the FlipPac faults the utilitarian shape is not one of them. As stated elsewhere in this thread the boxy profile allows for maximum space efficiency and the relatively vertical walls are advantageous to cargo storage and interior customization. Trying to make the camper look like a typical fiberglass shell with a profile that follows the cab roofline would give up too much space. I also see problems with a sleeping area that would be too narrow to adequately accommodate two adults. While a design that improves aerodynamics would be welcome I would not want to give up much if any interior volume as a result. Again as has been said elsewhere: “Form follows Function”

While I can see the attractions to a roof that opens to the rear, I think it may cause more issues than benefits. There is a lot to be said for the compact footprint and ease of set up that the current front opening FlipPac provides. With a rear opening design it may not be possible to tie the roof support poles directly to the vehicle. Having to secure support poles to the ground adds complexity. Think uneven sloping rocky ground and high winds.

Another issue, assuming a six foot (or less) truck bed length, is the length of the sleeping area, either the front would have to extend over the cab or the rear would have to extend past the rear bumper (like the Wildernest) in order to have a long enough sleeping area. Additionally, getting in and out of the sleeping area would be more difficult because of the tailgate area.

Barn doors would be nice but again I think this would add too much complexity and cost.

I'm not trying to put a damper on anyone's ideas, just playing devil's advocate. I think Tacodoc started a needed discussion and we should use it to brainstorm ideas.

Some improvements I'd like to see in a new design:

- Eliminate the torsion bar. Maybe replace it with some type of gear system?
- Relocate the lid latches to the inside and use alignment pins. The present external locations limit awning-mounting options. Internal latches would also provide better security.
- Make the shell sidewalls completely flat so windows or solid access panels can be easily added.
- Source high quality windows.
- Reinforce the shell / provide built-in mounting locations for easy installation of awnings and roof racks.

Cliff

Hire Cliff, he's really got it figured out :)

The only thing I can add... streamline all exterior parts so they don't get hung up on tree branches, etc. Integrate work lights into the body of the camper for the same reasons. Perhaps add some waterproof speakers linked to this :)

While barn doors are cool, I refuse to give up my tailgate, it's the most valuable attribute of a pickup. We rarely use chairs or tables thanks to it.
I would consider replacing my flip pac and tailgate if it had all of Cliff's suggestions and was built as a lightweight slide in camper.

After living out of the flip pac for a month, I don't see much room for improvement other than torsion bar and materials.
I have always said it was the ugliest thing I've ever done to a vehicle, but much like wearing crocks...you can't hate the comfort, convenience, and light weight :)

I lost my love affair with the idea of an Earthroamerlike rear cantilever design for a flip pac. Problems associated with high winds and flexy suspension would only be amplified w/rear open design, regardless of how you anchor it.

All that being said, it will be neat to see what they do. UM's craftsmanship and attention to detail would certainly improve upon the flip pac, even if it was a only a near clone. Something radically different would probably be cool too.
 

matt s

Explorer
Personally, I would like to see an E-Camper in a "bolts on anything" style, like a Maggiolina. But lighter than a Maggiolina, with a much lower profile.

This. I think they ought to be able to pull this off with minimal retooling. I would go for one in their traditional type set up for my blazer in a heartbeat.

I would also love to see it in the flip form. A bolt it to your rig kit. Pretty please. Sell the full finished topper but also sell the tent/flip portion as a kit for retrofit do it yourselfers (realizing of course that this may not be at all possible but a guy can dream)

I figured the upgraded tent was a no brainer and the reason this all started.
 

Finlay

Triarius
The more I look at Ursa-Minor products (j30 in particular), the more I think a pop top topper is the way to go.

Personally, I wouldn't mind if it had a similar layout and shape as the current Flip-Pac - a shell with a small overhang - a 7.5 foot bed would be the bees knees, and a cozy sleeping area would be much nicer in the colder temps.
 

Ursa Minor

Active member
Good stuff

Interesting ideas being kicked around, and given the title I am keeping up with the discussion as able. I can probably give some insight on what may or may not be feasible (for Ursa Minor at least) as I get a chance.

There's always a trade off between a specific model design and a generic one. Flip-Pac has a big box approach that fits many trucks and maximizes volume. In contrast, my Jeep design is a highly specific model design. The intent was an OEM look that fit in/around the existing contours but did not maximize the volume. That's a pretty key decision to make early on. It would be better (for me) to leverage our narrower design tent so I lean toward another less-square more OEM design as a result.

As far as fold over vs pop up, we could do either but for a truck camper would do both

For those interested...send me an email titled "Truck Camper" and let me know year/make/model/bed length x width and where you are located (city/state). I'll file it away in folder and eventually I'll find a night in a couple months (to set expectations) where those interested can meet at our shop one evening to look at some things , and if I need a little bit of information about a particular vehicle, I'll know who to contact.

thanks for the enthusiasm,
John


NOTE: My responses to this or any thread, pm, voicemail or email may be delayed, I have a kid due rather soon :)
 

homemade

Adventurer
It would be better (for me) to leverage our narrower design tent so I lean toward another less-square more OEM design as a result


If you are able a photoshop of what you might have in mind would help, I think a photoshop was done early on with the Jeep product. That might be very helpful.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
188,471
Messages
2,905,529
Members
230,428
Latest member
jacob_lashell
Top