MattScott
Approved Vendor
Exactly. There's nothing about an LR4 that would make me feel it isn't going to depreciate as quickly as every other Rover in the last 20 years.
What about the Autozone rear lights that I like?
Exactly. There's nothing about an LR4 that would make me feel it isn't going to depreciate as quickly as every other Rover in the last 20 years.
I understand the sentiments of the long-time Land Rover owners here. I am one myself.
If you look at the data, though, the resale market values of all Land Rover products has been on a steady, if not sharp, increase in the last 5 plus years. Discounting the rare instances where someone bought an LR3 for next to nothing, it is difficult to find a clean LR3 of any year or mileage for less than $17000. Considering these cars sold new in the high-$40k price bracket some 6 years ago, I'd say that a 30% residual value is very strong and much stronger than many German brand SUVs.
Once again I understand the general sentiment here, but the numbers don't lie. I work with these numbers on a daily basis in my position with Land Rover and can absolutely state that resale and residual values have never been stronger. There is no reason to think that this trend wont continue or at least maintain at its current level.
Quality and reliability has improved, which has improved resale value for all of the trucks. Personally, I like the LR3 a lot. It is the newer Rover I recommend people buy. BMW engineering and quality systems greatly improved the platform.
I am really enjoying the LR4. So far, it is a pleasure to drive, but we just don't have enough time with it or enough trail testing to give a long-term recommendation.
The numbers don't like? Using your example and Land Rover depreciates ~$5K a year (or $13/day). Maybe it's just the fact that I'm a CPA, but this is horrendous.
Quality and reliability has improved, which has improved resale value for all of the trucks. Personally, I like the LR3 a lot. It is the newer Rover I recommend people buy. BMW engineering and quality systems greatly improved the platform.
I am really enjoying the LR4. So far, it is a pleasure to drive, but we just don't have enough time with it or enough trail testing to give a long-term recommendation.
The LR3 is the smarter buy in all respects -- and it would cost me $20k less all day long.
But my own vanity is proving to be more formidable than I anticipated. The LR4 just looks way cooler to me, even though the exterior differences are relatively insignificant.
Man, talk about First World problems.![]()
The numbers don't like? Using your example and Land Rover depreciates ~$5K a year (or $13/day). Maybe it's just the fact that I'm a CPA, but this is horrendous.
I imagine your decision was based More on the fact that you did not want a RR to sell. $35k seems like a great offer on a Jeep JK.Felix, thought of you yesterday as a fella offered me $20k plus his 84k mile '06 big body RR(aprox $20 k value) for my '11 JKU. The RR had a list of $83.3k, and I had to turn him down as Manheim shows only mid teens for his RR. Or $70k depreciation in 6 years, and this on a prime low mile example. However, the point being LR touted the new RR the same way as the LR4, especially since it replaced the pitiful P38!!
Apples and oranges you may say, but I feel much more applicable than that- same story, different model. But as they said in the Big Chill(yea, I know- showing my age) "what is a day without a rationalization." Buy what you like, but really be sure you like what you are getting ready to buy![]()
Yeah that is a great offer for a Jeep, any Jeep really. I mean, you should have done it just to get rid of the Jeep.