1996-2000 4Runner, 5-speed, 4-cyl?

DaveInDenver

Middle Income Semi-Redneck
expeditionswest said:
Yeah, I don't want the fancy stuff. I want the power nothing package :)
A/C of course though.
It may be very basic. The liberated one that I know of up north has a AM/FM only radio (no tape, no CD), basic gauges (no tach, volt meter or oil pressure), small center console (just cupholders). It looks like a base 2WD truck inside, although it has carpet and bucket seats. It could be a fleet thing and not a regularly available model, though. BTW, it came out from St. Louis (a friend of a friend) and just lives in Ft. Collins until mid December.
 
Last edited:

Dave Bennett

Adventurist
DaveInDenver said:
They made a 2 door version up until 1993 (discontinued for 1994).

I have only seen this model once or twice, even counting all the Auto traders I've perused over the years. Very rare IMO.
 

dieselcruiserhead

16 Years on ExPo. Whoa!!
A friend had this combo in a '97 Tacoma in college. It was an excellent truck and the 4 cyl had surprising power. It did great on the highway and I could hardly tell the difference between it and the 6 cyls but I spent much less time in the 6 cyls at the time. But he would routinely drive 80 mph + to the ski areas and such. If you do decide on a locker, the entire rear diff from a V6 tacoma can be sourced for as little as $250-$300 via car-part.com. It will bolt in other than a little modification of the axle housing, there was recent discussion of it just a couple days ago. I have done it a couple times and it is an awesome route versus a full time locker in my opinion... Just takes a day or so to install...
 

Martinjmpr

Wiffleball Batter
DaveInDenver said:
I have zero experience with the 3RZ or 5VZ, heck with anything newer than 1991 really. But I didn't know the 3.4L V6 got as good or better mileage than the 2.7L 4 cylinder. If that's the case, then I don't know that it makes as much sense. One reason that I like the 4 cylinder trucks is working under the hood is so much less of a PITA because it's not shoe horned in. In the 22R/3VZ comparison there is a bigger aftermarket for the 20/22R motors and to some extent that's true of the 2/3RZ.

Is the 3VZ motor a further development of the old 22r or 22RE motor or is it a completely new one?

When I was shopping for my Taco last year, at first I wanted a 4 cyl for the MPG, but after doing a bit of research I realized that the MPG difference is pretty small (I think the 4 cyl/5 speed was rated at something like 18/22 vs. 17/21 for the 6.) I also realized that finding an X-cab 4x4 with a 4 cylinder was going to be pretty difficult in CO, and would get more difficult as I got to newer vehicles. I finally found an '04 with the V-6 and 5 speed and decided on that one, even though it wasn't a TRD, since it was in decent shape and had most of what I needed.

One of the things I like about having a fairly plane jane vehicle is that there's less stuff to go wrong: No power door locks, no power windows, no RKE, no auto tranny, no pushbutton T-case. If the interior materials are a little cheap(and they are, especially the seats) I can either live with that or replace them with something better, but the basic vehicle is as stone-axe simple as I'm willing to put up with (for example, I wouldn't buy a vehicle without AC but that's because for 20 years I lived without AC and realized that I was being stupid.)
 

DaveInDenver

Middle Income Semi-Redneck
Martinjmpr said:
Is the 3VZ motor a further development of the old 22r or 22RE motor or is it a completely new one?
The 3VZ is the 3.0L V6. The 2RZ and 3RZ are sort of similar to the 22R, but not interchangeable. I think the best description is that the 2RZ 2.4L and 3RZ 2.7L took a 22R and fixed the weak spots and made it overall more efficient and better. I really think they are fantastic motors that just got under appreciated in the line-up because Americans wanted more and more power. The 3RZ makes 150 HP, same as the 3.0L V6 but with better mileage and reliability. I think in the real world the 4 cylinder would get better mileage than the 3.4L V6 (5VZ), but the EPA numbers are generalized. The 5VZ is technically a refinement of the 3.0L engine, but they are not really in the same class. Sort of how a 22R is technically the same family as an 18R, but parts aren't interchangeable.
 

neliconcept

Spirit Overland
along side the comments of others, ill put in that these 4runners came with 4.56 gearing standard plus did not have ABS, and I think had the smaller breaks so that 15" wheels could be fitted.

good luck in the search
 

Nullifier

Expedition Leader
So if we find one in a different color would you consider just getting the right one painted white? If not then I think I know what you are trying to build.
 

Cackalak Han

Explorer
Here is one on Yotatech. LINK

I don't see any advantages with the 2.7L vs. 3.4L. Unless you're thinking of swapping in a diesel? Now, that would be cool.
 

wagner_joe

Adventurer
found a couple on-line..

$10,980
103,842 mi.1997 Toyota 4Runner SR5
White, 5 door, 4X4, SUV, MANUAL 5SPD, 3.4L V6, Stock# A1402.
Dealer: Gold Rush Chevrolet (Auburn, CA ~612 mi. away)
866-502-2443

Scott ya got a price range?
 

shawkins

Adventurer
wagner_joe said:
$10,980
103,842 mi.1997 Toyota 4Runner SR5
White, 5 door, 4X4, SUV, MANUAL 5SPD, 3.4L V6, Stock# A1402.
Dealer: Gold Rush Chevrolet (Auburn, CA ~612 mi. away)
866-502-2443

Scott ya got a price range?
That sounds like a pretty good one, I wouldn't pay more than $10k for it though more like $9.5k.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
188,604
Messages
2,907,766
Members
230,759
Latest member
Tdavis8695
Top