Rob, sounds like you and I need to edjumucate some folks about impeller and exhaust sizes. To be fair I think the t3super60 is better for these applications while the gt28 is better on our smaller engine but higher revving track cars. T3s60 is super cheap too. Not bad spool either given the displacement.
-Sam
I think a Super 60 would be a bit much for a sub-200hp diesel engine, no? IIRC, that was capable of putting out 300hp on a gas engine. It's also older generation, the aerodynamics just aren't as good.
This chart seems a bit off, but it appears to me the 300TDI used a variant of the T25, but it's a special arrangement with the CHRA built into the exhaust manifold.
http://www.turbomaster.info/eng/applications/passenger_cars/land+rover/
http://forums.lr4x4.com/index.php?showtopic=56836
Then the Td5 went to a GT2052 which is what I was going to suggest before I even found this info.
http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarrett/catelog/Turbochargers/GT20/GT2052_727264_1.htm
This demonstrates what I mean about the GT series. The GT20 can put out more power than a T25, yet is spools faster because it is in fact smaller. You get a big improvement in drivability. The difficulty would be in putting one on a 300TDI due to the integrated exhaust manifold. You might be able to fit a GT25 CHRA easily, or just build a new manifold and bolt on a normal GT20.
Apples and oranges. You are comparing a VNT on a petrol....
Granted.
On a diesel, they are magic. They are simple to control and peak torque goes way down in the rev range, basically killing turbo lag. Every diesel engine in the last ten years, at least, has one. Because the normal power band on a diesel is so small this makes a huge difference in driveability.
They're magic on a gas engine too. I'm just gun shy after having a $2000 turbo fail catastrophicly after 40,000km.
Exactly which turbo are you running?
I take issue with the statement that "every diesel in the last 10 years had a VNT". The Td5 didn't. Looks like the Puma diesel does. GTA2052V Notice however, they're still using a GT20 family turbo for that engine as well.
On a diesel??? I'm fairly up on the diesel performance scene and I've not heard of this happening. People blow turbos from high EGTs or from surge by running too much boost at low rpm. Sometimes seals go. Vane failure, nope.
No, on a gas. I admit I'm out of my element on diesel turbos. My main point to this posting is just to state that a GT turbo will over better performance over an older T series, and you don't have to think about vanes. It might be possible to put a GT25 CHRA into the 300TDI manifold. You couldn't do that with a VNT. If you were to go to the trouble of making a new manifold to fit a GT20 for even better performance, it probably makes sense to go with a GT20V VNT.
Been thinking along the lines of a timed low pressure oiler for when the engine is turned off...
I think water cooling would be better. It's simpler, and eliminates the need for the oiler.