LandRover 101 (Forward Control) rigs

Nonimouse

Cynical old bastard
Looks nice. I wanted one for years and years, then spent intimate time with a GS (with Nokken Winch). I wouldn't wish one on my worst enemy now. Awful to drive, truly awful. Lousy off road if any type of axle movement is required. Lousy brakes, lousy handling... And that's after the comprehensive re-build.

Here's a teazer

http://www.oldrover.com/101/101FC.htm

Check out the Vampire
 

greenmeanie

Adventurer
They are a truck you either love or hate and with plenty of quirks. They are best suited to the true enthusiast rather than someone who likes its rugged good looks.

I've had one for 10 years and still love it. I find it handles better than my series IIa 88 (Both trucks are well looked after), brakes well enough to get the back wheels of the ground if I want to (The front brakes are the same as a late series 109 and the rears are almost as big to match the 1 tonne rating. At 37ft the turning circle is tighter than a 109 and IIRC better than an 88.

It was never intended as a rock crawler and has the same issue as a lot of military vehicles as the suspension was designed to operate with the vehicle loaded. Add 3/4 tonne of gear and the suspension moves just fine - travel will always be limited by the spring length, short shocks and short shackles but actual wheel travel works out about the same as a stock series.

Some, but certainly not all, of the quirks you will have to deal with are the unatural position and throw of the gear stick, the infamous prop shaft rumble, a fairly cramped driving position and rear visibility. Ride suffers for the usual FC reason of the driver being directly above the front wheels but the view off road is great. Military bar grip tyres are 'interesting' in anything other than dry conditions. Given its airportable nature where everything strips off the truck the roll protection on a GS is marginal.

65mph is about all you want to do with either an overdrive or regeared TC. They can do more but it goes from the merely painful to really questioning your sanity. As it a low compression Rover V8 powerplant power upgrades are easy and the LT95 gearbox will take all the grunt a Rover lump can throw at it.

There was never a great number of them built in the first place and they have been out of service for a few years now so finding a good unmolested one is quite difficult.

There is a very active club with parts support at:
101 Club

As you may gather I fall on the enthusiast side of the fence.
 

Nonimouse

Cynical old bastard
"They are a truck you either love or hate and with plenty of quirks"

Very true. I'm a luddite at heart and have a deep seated love of old vehicles. I class my '89 110 as a modern ride. But for me the 101 was akin to the Harley 883 Sportster. I had dreamed of owning both; and put them up on a pedestal of perfection to aspire to. Both were massive let downs.

However without the let down of the Harley I would have never met the Buell; without the let down of the 101 I would never have sold the 100" and bought the 110.

Such is life
 

greenmeanie

Adventurer
Meh,
After driving a couple of boingers I really realized I love my 101 and to a slightly lesser extent my 88 and 109. To me Rovers lost their character when they went away from leaf springs. This is just my preference but goes some way to explaining why I have never bought into the Defender thing.
 

greenmeanie

Adventurer
Ah, there is a Defender thing and a 110/127/90 thing. A big difference

Its the same basic vehicle so not really. I used to drive an '83 110 that was in the family. I just couldn't develop the attachment I have to my leafers despite the 110 having practically the same engine and gearbox as my 101.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
189,533
Messages
2,917,958
Members
232,442
Latest member
rumpityz28
Top