Land Rover did lose its way a bit under Fords control. That is where the slick centres coupled with Jag dealers came from. As well as the wearing of dress clothes instead of outdoor gear.
LOL
Land Rover dealers in the 70's wore dress clothes.
Personally, I thought it was a bit silly all the salespeople wearing outdoor gear at Land Rover Buckhead. But then again, they wanted to sell an image. A "lifestyle".
To them, marketing the "lifestyle" is more important than knowing Land Rover sold 5-speed Discoveries and Defenders in the US (which I found out when I called them about replacing the clutch in my Discovery).
In '93 I applied for a sales job at a Land Rover dealer and part of the interview was a mock sales pitch on my part. I was told
specifically that I didn't get the job because I focused on the actual capabilities of the vehicles, rather than the image they present.
I can't see how I offend by stating that the LR3 chassis is the most robust ever made. I am only saying that it is created using the best technology of the day. That being hydro-forming, which creates a stronger chassis with less weak weld spots. It is also thicker than older frames and has more structural rigidity.
I can only speak for myself, but I wasn't offended, I just thought it was funny. It'll be interesting to see how the chassis that's
the most robust ever made fares as the platform for one of these
Tom- we all appreciate the older LR's and the ability to do field repairs, but a modern automobile company can hardly stick with 1970's technology just because it's easy fix.
Who said anything about sticking with 1970's technology?
as for the Jeep website, Please they make a 2wd wrangler, nuff said.
FYI, Land Rover made some 2WD models. In any case, I'd much rather see a 2WD Defender available for those who need a truck, but not 4WD, than see the Defender go the way of the Discovery 3 or Discovery 4.