jrueppel
Adventurer
I agree with pretty much everything Wade said above. I've had a great experience talking with AT about Habitat details and ideas over the last 15 months. It's a brave new world of having customer input involved in the design process. It's been great to have as much information as possible about the development process and the problem solving going into it. The more the better. Getting regular updates has definitely made waiting for the best Christmas present in the world to come a lot easier.
I totally understand delays because of required design improvements to the shell and opening mechanism. If it has to be reengineered to handle the stresses then that's what has to be done.
If the Habitat and version 3 tent are available early enough to still get some enjoyment out of them in the Summer and Fall, then going with an early version of the tent which will be replaced with a version 4 makes sense to me. It's not ideal, but there are benefits and drawbacks to being early adopters. I've got the same concerns about getting to Prescott more then once, installation ease, additional cost, recouping cost on the first tent, etc.
That said, to my eye, the version 4 of the tent really represents a big leap in design from the version 3. If I'd never seen it I'm sure I would have been totally happy with the version 3, but now the genie is out of the bottle. The shape and design of the windows and doors really looks well finished. All in all it looks solid. The awning design and the hint of a possible 4 pole/4 seasons set up is icing on the cake.
Based on my interactions with AT I'm pretty optimistic they'll burn the midnight oil to make these transitions easier on everyone. If I go with the version 3 tent on the shell it'd be good to understand how a version 4 tent retro fit would work and what the cost would actually be.
my2cents
Jeff
I totally understand delays because of required design improvements to the shell and opening mechanism. If it has to be reengineered to handle the stresses then that's what has to be done.
If the Habitat and version 3 tent are available early enough to still get some enjoyment out of them in the Summer and Fall, then going with an early version of the tent which will be replaced with a version 4 makes sense to me. It's not ideal, but there are benefits and drawbacks to being early adopters. I've got the same concerns about getting to Prescott more then once, installation ease, additional cost, recouping cost on the first tent, etc.
That said, to my eye, the version 4 of the tent really represents a big leap in design from the version 3. If I'd never seen it I'm sure I would have been totally happy with the version 3, but now the genie is out of the bottle. The shape and design of the windows and doors really looks well finished. All in all it looks solid. The awning design and the hint of a possible 4 pole/4 seasons set up is icing on the cake.
Based on my interactions with AT I'm pretty optimistic they'll burn the midnight oil to make these transitions easier on everyone. If I go with the version 3 tent on the shell it'd be good to understand how a version 4 tent retro fit would work and what the cost would actually be.
my2cents
Jeff