dyogim
Explorer
I completely disagree.
Last weekend I had the Tundra up to 170 km/hr or 105mph (on a legal blocked off racetrack of course) and it pulled better than stock all the way there with the 35's. If you go with 4.88's you will lose the top end (which might not be a big deal) and make the truck better for city driving. Lower gears will only benefit you on the highway for the times when normally the trans would want to bump down a gear but at the sacrifice of higher RPMs all the times you are driving on flat ground. I would 100% not want 4.88's with my 35's. The truck is already geared noticeably lower and you can absolutely tell when driving on the highway. Any lower and you would be at 2500-2700rpm doing 65 mph. No thanks. If highway driveability is your concern I think 4.56 is the best option. The truck will still downshift on large hills but I will easily pull a normal grade hill without. I really do feel like the truck behaves like it did stock with 4.56's except it does rev higher at the same given speed.
I do track my milage but have not had a single full tank of street driving yet since I did the gears. There was been 4x4 and 4-Low in the last few tanks to my fuel consumption won't be accurate. My "gut" feeling is that I am getting ~15mpg average mix of city/highway. Keep in mind I typically drive 70mph on the highway.... driving slower I suspect would greatly increase fuel economy. I'm going to test my theory out this weekend when I drive to the coast. Should be able to get some good highway consumption numbers while not driving too fast.
Just my $0.02
You make a great point and one of the reasons why it depends on how one will drive their rig and what their plans are.
I based the 4.88 decision over the 4.56 to gain more low end torque. Rather than at the higher end. It best fit my needs and my intentions for crawling when off-roading.
Seanpistol - you'll have to determine what your future intentions are and then decide.