Scott Brady
Founder
calamaridog said:Scott,
The ARB 4runner is outfitted similarly as a 100 series can be. Bumper, winch, slider/steps, roof rack, V8 and automatic transmission, mild suspension upgrade, etc.
How would you compare the performance of the ARB 4runner to a 100 series vehicle?
I would assume they are similar, with the 4runner being a bit lighter, smaller, more nimble.
Bryan,
I will do my best to answer your question, having driven both the 100 and 4Runner.
Overall:
The most significant difference is responsiveness. Both on the road and trail, the 4Runner is quicker, handles flatter and more responsive. That is just a result of weight difference. The 100 really is a bit sluggish in comparison.
What is was suprised by is the fit, finish and solid nature of the 4Runner. Right on par with the 100, though the dash materials and layout of the 100 is better IMO. No rattles, nice C-Gate shifter and great leather seats.
Suspension:
The 4Runner front suspension by design has an advantage over the 100, and did a better job of controling pitch. I have also noticed the hard extension of the 100's due to the limited extension travel with cranked in lift.
The rear of the 100 has an advantage. I was surprised by the limited wheel travel in the rear of the 4Runner, which appears to be a result of the swaybar. Overall suspension travel is fine, but articulation limited.
Trail Performance:
This is just a function of size and weight. The 4Runner doesnt slide and struggle on steep slopes like its heavier cousin.
The advantage the 100 has is overall clearance. 35" tall tires can be fitted with minimal lift. That wins major points in my book.
I prefer the 4Runner, mostly because of the size and overall value.